Since this, then, is the nature
of proof, when we consider that some men are quicker of wit and others duller,
that some are reared in better environment, others in worse, those of the
latter class being inferior in character and native disposition will require
more proofs and more diligent attention to be led to master the teachings in
question and to be molded by them; just as defective physiques, when the goal
is to restore perfect health, require very diligent and prolonged
treatment.
On the other hand such pupils as
are of a finer nature and have enjoyed better training will more easily and
more quickly, and with few proofs, assent to sound reasoning and put it into
practice. How true this is we may readily recognize if we chance to know two
lads or young men, of whom one has been reared in luxury, his body effeminate,
his spirit weakened by soft living, and having besides a dull and torpid
disposition; the other reared somewhat in the Spartan manner, unaccustomed to
luxury, practiced in self-restraint, and ready to listen to sound reasoning.
If then we place these two young
men in the position of pupils of a philosopher arguing that death, toil,
poverty, and the like are not evils, or again that life, pleasure, wealth, and
the like are not goods, do you imagine that both will give heed to the argument
in the same fashion, and that one will be persuaded by it in the same degree as
the other? Far from it.
I think
the only compliment I have occasionally received, from people who don’t really
know me well, is that I am somehow “smart”. The fact is, unfortunately, that I
am not really “smart” at all, and I usually find myself far slower and dimmer
than most people around me. I try my hardest to be deliberately thoughtful, but
I am not naturally gifted with a profound intelligence, or a quick memory, or
an aptitude for discerning patterns and solving problems.
I think
I know something of what Musonius Rufus is talking about, since what little I
have managed to grasp in life did not come from an innate disposition. This
means it will take me more time, and more attempts, and more explanations to
help me understand. I need to look at it many times, from many different
angles, and with many false starts.
I may
not have the nature, but I was at least blessed with some decent nurture, in
that I was raised in an environment of character and learning. I often
stubbornly rejected it, though enough managed to stick with me nonetheless. That
made a big difference, for which I am always grateful.
We are
all born with different strengths and weaknesses, inclined to some abilities
over others, and that is something that was given to us, not something we
chose. We are all put in a certain place in this world, influenced by a certain
environment, and that too is something that was given to us, not something we
chose. Providence made us as we are, and placed us where we are.
Yet that
is not all that we are, or all that we can become. Stoicism teaches us that
things happen to us, beyond our control, while who we ultimately are is determined by what we decide to make of all
that, completely within our control.
Yes,
some can take the quicker path, because of what they have to work with, and
others can take the slower path, because of what they have to work with. The
trick lies in still sticking closely to the path, straight or winding, in
either case. The path doesn’t need to be broadened; it needs to be more
carefully marked.
Both the
genius and the dullard, whether from nature or from nurture, have within them
the ability to intellectually, morally, and spiritually improve themselves.
They can both rightly do this in their own way; one will simply require more
effort, diligence, and discipline than the other in doing so.
Did I readily
comprehend that death, toil, and poverty were not evils? No. Did I readily
comprehend that life, pleasure, and wealth were not goods? No. This was because
it was not easy for me to wrap my head around one simple truth: the only
highest and complete human good is the practice of wisdom and of virtue, to
know and to love, and that everything else is entirely relative to that principle.
For
those of us who are not the sharpest tools in the shed, we might require some
help with the sharpening. But it does need to be sharpening and not dulling.
Help me to understand one truth well, instead of twenty half-truths poorly.
Don’t just give me more reasons; lead me to one really good reason.
It may
take me a while, but with some patience I will get there. Point me in a single
direction, however, and not in many. Both the tortoise and the hare need to be focus
on one goal.
Written in 2/1999
No comments:
Post a Comment