How
small a part of the boundless and unfathomable time is assigned to every man,
for it is very soon swallowed up in the eternal!
And
how small a part of the whole Substance; and how small a part of the Universal
Soul; and on what a small clod of the whole earth you creep!
Reflecting
on all this, consider nothing to be great, except to act as your nature leads you,
and to endure that which the Common Nature brings.
—Marcus
Aurelius, Meditations, Book 12.32 (tr
Long)
Stoicism
does indeed ask me to be responsible for myself, but I must also remember that
it does not ask me to make myself the measure of all things. I am not the
center of gravity, or that around which the world revolves, or the absolute by
which everything else is to be judged. The part is in service to the whole, not
the whole in service to the part.
Not only
am I a part of Nature, but I am a rather small part within a grand design, only
here for the briefest moment, one instance of thought among countless others.
This
does not mean that I have no value, but it certainly means that I am not all
that is of value. I am with other things, never above other things. I am the
master of my own good, but I am not the master of all that is good.
The
self-reliance of Stoicism can tempt me into becoming quite self-serving, in
which case it would hardly be any different from so many other forms of
subjectivism, relativism, and egoism that pass for philosophy, that are so
especially fashionable at the moment.
It is
easy for me to blame others, to be angry at the world, or to stubbornly insist
that I am not getting what I deserve.
Informed
by a twisted form of Stoicism, I might then instead transform my resentment
into dismissing others, ignoring the world, or stubbornly insisting that no one
deserves anything at all from me. The expression is different, while the vanity
remains the same. There is still no sense of my commitment to my neighbor, or
of a reverence for Nature.
“I don’t
care about the universe, because the universe doesn’t care about me.” I find no
wisdom in that. “You don’t exist for me. What you do is meaningless to me.” I
find no virtue in that.
Stoicism
does indeed ask me to radically change my perspective, but it cannot just be a
change where I modify and shuffle around the terms of my own importance. The
particular will only make sense with the context of the universal, my nature
within Nature. I am called to follow virtue, because my own nature tells me it
is right. I am called to show respect for whatever may happen to me, because
Nature herself tells me it is right.
Written in 10/2009
No comments:
Post a Comment