This
reflection is most adapted to move us to contempt of death, that even those who
think pleasure to be a good and pain an evil still have despised it.
—Marcus
Aurelius, Meditations, Book 12.34 (tr
Long)
I once
liked bickering about ideologies, because the thought of being right made me
feel more important. What I completely misunderstood was all about what it even
meant to be right.
Being
right isn’t about holding the supposedly correct view, while ridiculing and
condemning anyone who holds the supposedly incorrect view. Being right is about
making myself better, and never about making anyone else worse. Once my own
right is at the expense of another, it immediately ceases to be right.
In
philosophy, religion, or politics, we love to hate the “other”. You surely see
the problem. There is no real love where there is any presence of hate.
Let me
fix my own problems, and exorcise my own demons. Then, and only then, let me
help others fix their own problems, and exorcise their own demons, on their
terms, and not just on mine. Helping is the key, not forcing.
Have you
ever come across a stubborn mule? That is how you treat the man you now so
proudly call your enemy. He will not change one bit, unless you treat him with
the respect he deserves.
“But
he’s just a mule!”
No, he
is a man like you. Treat him as you would like to be treated. Anything less,
and suddenly you are now the animal, not him.
In Rome,
the two major conflicting philosophies were Stoicism on the one hand, and
Epicureanism on the other. The former preached about providence and virtue, and
the latter preached about randomness and pleasure.
Yet, in
an odd sort of way, they both ended up teaching that a good man would have to
be wise, brave, moderate, and just. They simply came at it from very different
angles.
That
difference of principles is deeply important, even as the shared sense of human
decency is more important. The Stoic is not unfeeling, and the Epicurean is not
gluttonous. Work with that to begin with, and find the common ground. The
conflicts can only be resolved through what is universal.
Virtue
or pleasure? Yes. Both. The priority is what we are fussing about.
Here is
something shared: neither the Stoic nor the Epicurean has any fear or worries
about death. They both understand that life will end. They both understand that
life should be lived well. They both understand that how we live matters far
more than how long we live, or when we die.
Marcus
Aurelius reminds us that we can find at least one thing that binds us together.
Begin with that, and a sense of solidarity can then perhaps follow.
“You
filthy Epicurean! I’ll kill you now!” You stopped being a Stoic when you said
that. He fears death no more than you.
Written in 10/2009
No comments:
Post a Comment