He who believes giving to be an easy
matter, is mistaken. It offers very great difficulties, if we bestow our bounty
rationally, and do not scatter it impulsively and at random.
I do this man a service, and I need a
good turn done me by that one. I help this other, because I pity him. This man,
again, I teach that he is not a fit object for poverty to hold down or degrade.
I shall not give some men anything,
although they are in want, because, even if I do give to them they will still
be in want. I shall proffer my bounty to some, and shall forcibly thrust it
upon others. I also cannot be neglecting my own interests while I am doing
this.
At no time do I make more people in my
debt than when I am giving things away. "What?" say you, "do you
give that you may receive again?" At any rate I do not give that I may
throw my bounty away. What I give should be so placed that although I cannot
ask for its return, yet it can be given back to me. . . .
—Seneca
the Younger, On the happy life,
Chapter 24 (tr Stewart)
Back
when I was still in Boston, working in social services, one of the priests who
ran the agency was affectionately known for always being late in the morning.
This wasn’t because he was lazy, but because he was still one of those priests
who proudly wore his clerical collar, and this meant that he would be
constantly approached by the needy and homeless in the streets for assistance.
He took this duty seriously, and we would often not see him until the
afternoon.
His
method of offering help was, however, not what one might expect. If he was
asked for money to get food or clothes, he would never give money, but offered to
buy someone a meal, or provide him with new shoes and a coat.
This was
his way of estimating character. He knew that those who became angry with him
had other intentions in mind, but he would always encourage those who were
willing, and even those who appeared hesitant. He would often take someone to
breakfast, get to know him, and then suggest different options for finding
shelter, meals, medical assistance, and work. Many of these people became our
clients, and many became our friends.
The
priest gave in charity, because he gave all of himself, even as the lawyers and
bankers at the train stations looked the other way. He also realized that
giving to others must be reasonable and responsible, always keeping in mind not
just the act of giving, but how the gift would assist someone to be a better
human being.
Sometimes,
the people he met would be a bit dumbstruck, and awkwardly express that they
would always be in his debt. Again, his words were perhaps unusual.
“Yes,”
he would say, “You are in my debt. But you don’t need to give me anything. I hope that one day, however, when you
have more, you choose to give to
someone else, or maybe even to me, if you see me where you were just now.”
I think
he understood he had an interest in how his generosity was used, just as Seneca
did, and I know he was scolded for being selfish, just as Seneca was. “See! It
turns out you just want to get something in return!”
Of
course I have an interest, but it is not the interest of the greedy man. I
should not wish to be wasteful, but to see benefit from what has been shared.
For me, that benefit should be the knowledge that I have helped another to
practice virtue, that I would like to see him share for himself, and that I
would be glad if he also shared with me. I hope another man will act well
toward me, as I acted well toward him, but I can hardly ever force him to do
so. Love is a choice.
A bad
man expects repayment, but a good man is only grateful to receive it. A bad man
expects a return for his own profit, but a good man is happy to see the return
in the profit of another. A gift is only a gift when it is freely offered, and
never when it is demanded.
Seneca’s
adversary earlier accused him of wanting to be rich, and now accuses him of
wanting to be compensated. The response to the former also applies to the
latter. I should never desire or expect to be wealthy, though I may prefer it.
I should never desire or expect to be repaid, though I may prefer it.
Self-interest can simply be for the self to do what is good, while selfishness
is only to do what is good for the self.
Written in 5/2004
Image: William-Adolphe Bouguereau, Charity (c. 1878)
No comments:
Post a Comment