Since
we, however, have not such strength of mind as this, we ought at any rate to
diminish the extent of our property, in order to be less exposed to the
assaults of fortune.
Those
men whose bodies can be within the shelter of their armor, are more fitted for
war than those whose huge size everywhere extends beyond it, and exposes them
to wounds.
The
best amount of property to have is that which is enough to keep us from
poverty, and which yet is not far removed from it.
The dark
and cynical side of me (not the bright and Cynic side, mind you) snorts when I
hear the rich and powerful telling us how they just can’t help being rich and
powerful, and that we should have a deep sympathy for their plight.
Yet I am
questioning their motives, when I should really be questioning my own. Are
their intentions pure, when they say that they are playing the cards that Fate
dealt them, or are my intentions pure, when I am secretly jealous that I didn’t
get those same cards?
Perhaps some
of them do indeed possess the sincerity and character to see their lives as
guided by responsibility, not by entitlement. I would be well advised to follow
such an example.
Both
Seneca and Serenus are men whom Providence gave the circumstances of great wealth,
and I take them at their word, that they did not take this state of affairs
lightly. Others are instead given the circumstances of poverty. Neither are to
a man’s blame or credit, though what he chooses to make of those conditions
will most certainly be to his blame or credit. Stoicism, I must remember, does
not measure a man by what he has, but by what he does.
Even if
I were to be given worldly prosperity, however, I would have to be very careful
about how much I would decide to take. How much is enough? The general Stoic
answer, of course, is to accept whatever may help me be the best man I can be,
whether I have more or less, but there is also the inherent danger of
overreaching. I have very rarely asked too little for myself, but I have quite
often asked for far too much.
Enough,
in such a case where I might have my preference, is to have what meets my
immediate needs, whatever they may be, and nothing beyond that. Give me
anything additional, and the temptation will be to expand the scope of my body’s
reach, at the expense of my soul’s integrity.
I enjoy
Seneca’s image of becoming too fat for one’s armor, and I imagine a chubby legionnaire
who has consumed too much bread and wine vainly trying to hunker down behind
the protection of his scutum. The danger of being injured or killed comes
from having made too much of oneself, of inflating a sense of self-importance
beyond what is natural.
Want for
little, and little can be taken. Ask for an excess, and everything can too easily
be lost. Once security depends upon anything outside the circle of the soul’s
virtues, I am at the mercy of all those slings and arrows of outrageous
fortune.
Written in 9/2011
No comments:
Post a Comment