It
is royal to do good and to be abused.
—Marcus
Aurelius, Meditations, Book 7 (tr
Long)
Once again, this is the sort of saying
that raises eyebrows and gets you crossed off the invite list for parties.
It would indeed be foolish to desire
or prefer abuse, but what is truly noble is the willingness to do what is right
and good even when, and especially when, one faces disapproval and opposition
for doing so.
The merit of any action proceeds not
only from what is done, but also from the conditions under which it is done,
and from the reasons why it is done. Morality, in this sense, is more than a
set of rules to blindly follow; it is the relationship of a deliberate
intention for the sake of a worthy goal.
For this reason, the politician who
smiles at you may not be kind at all, if he only does so to get your vote. The
businessman who donates his money may not be charitable at all, if he only does
so to get a break on his taxes. The priest who gives a good sermon may not be
pious at all, if he only does so to be revered.
The true test of virtue is rather to
practice integrity, commitment, fairness, or moderation for their own sake, and
nothing beyond that. There is a reason we say that a good deed is its own
reward, because the dignity of choice and action requires nothing beyond itself
to be complete. Whether there are any further consequences that may be
convenient, or profitable, or advantageous need not enter into our thinking. It
is enough for happiness to have lived well.
This is especially true if
conscience meets an obstacle. Perhaps my choices will clash with dismissal,
rejection, ridicule, or downright hatred. Perhaps my actions will mean losing
my wealth, my influence, my comfort, or even my life. If it must be so, I must
let it be so, and I should embrace such burdens with grace and good will. It is
a small price to pay with my circumstances for the state of my own soul, as the
value of what I do is far greater than the value of what is done to me.
I will recognize the virtuous man as
being noble, as being royal, as even being divine, when he continues to do what
is right in the face of what is wrong, and when he is willing to treat others
well, even when they treat him poorly.
Antisthenes was a student of
Socrates, and is often considered the first of the Cynic philosophers. His
words may seem odd to the man who defines himself by his status, but they are a
pleasant encouragement to the man who defines himself by his character.
Written in 11/2007
No comments:
Post a Comment