Why
should unskilled and ignorant souls disturb him who has skill and knowledge?
What soul then has skill and knowledge? That which knows beginning and end, and
knows the Reason that pervades all substance, and through all time by fixed
periods administers the Universe.
—Marcus
Aurelius, Meditations, Book 5 (tr
Long)
I will often find myself feeling
frustrated and offended when the actions of others are thoughtless and
careless. I will then be tempted to act vindictively or dismissively, but both
of these responses are themselves thoughtless and careless. They both proceed
from a disordered sense of self, an unwillingness to understand myself in right
relation to others and to the world around me.
A man will be unskilled in life not
because he lacks training in some specific trade, but because he neglects the
essential art of acting with character. He will be ignorant in life not because
he lacks any formal education, but because he doesn’t know who he is, where he
came from, and where he is going. If I strive to attain both skill and wisdom,
I should surely know that allowing myself to get upset only weakens my own
power to live well. I must remember that a foolish man acts he as he does from
a lack of understanding, and my anger will help neither him nor me.
As is so often the case, Marcus
Aurelius doesn’t just tell us not to be disturbed, but he offers a very brief
yet thorough account of why this should be so. If I am to live well, this is
only possible if I grasp my own part within the context of the whole. It isn’t
just about me, or about how I feel, or about how I perceive myself to have been
wronged.
Everything that happens is according
to a universal order and purpose, and it is the wise man that can comprehend,
however incompletely, that his own thoughts and actions should be in harmony
with Nature, not in conflict with it. If I can respect that there is a reason
for why things are as they are, I can then seek out the good in all things.
There are no grounds for being
disturbed. There are only grounds for discovering how to freely participate in
a greater good for everything.
When I was first asked to read
Homer’s Iliad, I rolled my eyes, and
was, in a sense, offended that I should have to examine some dusty old text,
one I thought irrelevant to my life, and also so difficult to read. It didn’t
take long for me to change my tune.
I immediately saw that this was a
story with many strands and many themes, but one that stood out for me, time and time again, was the rage of Achilles. Here was a great man, but
a man who too often acted only for himself, without seeing the big picture,
motivated by vanity instead of wisdom. When he struggles against Agamemnon,
when he refuses to fight, when he reacts to the death of Patroclus, or when he
denies pity to Hector, he is consumed by selfish passion.
I walked away from that first
reading with a profound sense that I always needed to look to origins and ends,
and how what I did played into a greater sense of meaning and purpose. I didn’t
need to be disturbed by pettiness, or lash out at others, if I could only see
beyond myself to the reason that is shared by all.
Written in 8/2006
IMAGE: Giovanni Battista Tiepolo, The Rage of Achilles (1757)
IMAGE: Giovanni Battista Tiepolo, The Rage of Achilles (1757)
No comments:
Post a Comment