You
have existed as a part. You shall disappear in that which produced you; but
rather you shall be received back into its seminal principle by transmutation.
—Marcus
Aurelius, Meditations, Book 4 (tr
Long)
As I
write this, just as our new millennium has begun, people who describe
themselves as "Modern" Stoics will bicker and argue, at conferences and on the Internet,
as to whether there is any form of a God, or whether there could possibly be any
life after death. Too many of them end up defining themselves by their petty
and hateful disagreements.
These
are indeed essential questions, and the use of reason, not prejudice, should be
at the root of any answer. Yet I usually see only fallacies and insults, on all
sides, so I stay well clear of such conflicts. I find it disturbing that people
who say they follow reason, and believe in human solidarity, will behave with
such terrible prejudice, and with such spite for their fellows.
Here’s
my trick for bearing my compass. Once I’m told that something is an “of
course”, or that “only an idiot would believe it”, you have lost my interest.
The rise of the quick “sound bite” answer to life’s question has become a
serious hindrance to our sanity. Thinking can never be replaced by arrogant
presumption.
I should
never begin my own reasoning with a conclusion, but rather with the true
premises that can in turn lead to a sound conclusion. I choose to approach
Stoicism as a philosophy, and not as a theology.
At the
same time, I never assume that Stoicism excludes religion, or that reason
excludes faith. That is a false dichotomy. There are things I may know, and
then there are things that may well also be quite reasonable to believe, if I
have good grounds for trusting their authority. Faith is simply trust, and
trust can be quite reasonable. I will never know if my wife will betray me, but
I have good faith that she won’t.
What
will become of me when I die? All I do know with any certainty is that my own
existence is a piece of the whole of existence. I do know that I have my own
part, however small, and I also do know that anything and everything in this
Universe plays its part within a complete and ordered unity. I do know that things
in themselves are never reduced to nothing, and that things in themselves never
arise from nothing.
Who or
what I am will never cease, in whatever form, and I know that it will change,
that it will be rebuilt, and that it will be transformed. Whatever it was that
made me also made certain that I will return right back into whatever it was
that made me, and to be wherever I need to be, however I might be transmuted.
I never
took an interest in Stoicism because I wanted to justify whether I already did
or did not believe in any God, or whether I did or did not believe in any specific
sort of afterlife. Stoicism, like all good philosophy, is about reason, not
rationalization.
Marcus
Aurelius has it quite right. What I am now will certainly end, and then I will
be something else, flowing back into whatever I came from, and becoming
something new. I will most certainly feed the worms, and I may even perhaps
feed into many other things.
I leave
it to powers greater than myself to decide what that might be. I do not presume
to tell Providence how to do her business.
Written in 8/2005
Image: M.C. Escher, Reptiles (1943)
No comments:
Post a Comment