It
is satisfaction to a man to do the proper works of a man.
Now
it is a proper work of a man to be benevolent to his own kind, to despise the
movements of the senses, to form a just judgment of plausible appearances, and
to take a survey of the Nature of the Universe and of the things that happen in
it.
—Marcus
Aurelius, Meditations, Book 8 (tr
Long)
I once put this
quote on a little chalkboard I had on my office door. For all the years I was a
teacher, I would change the quote every week, from Plato to Aquinas, from Augustine
to Nietzsche. The response to this one was quite overwhelming, but it wasn’t
for the reasons I had hoped for.
See, the word
“man” was troublesome for a few folks. By this point in the game of political correctness,
I got flack just a few hours after I had written it out. No one came to me
directly, of course, but some went straight to the Dean, a few went straight to
the President, and one even wrote to the Board of Directors.
I am sadly
still of the old school in this regard, and I still think that the word “man”
can sometimes mean a male more narrowly, and sometimes mean any human more
broadly. I am in no doubt about the sense Marcus Aurelius was using here in
this passage.
Read it in
context. It is our job as human beings to be kind and just, to not simply be
moved by our passions, to think clearly, and to understand who we are in the
order of all things. This isn’t simply the responsibility of a male, or of a
female, or of this or that race, or of any perceived identity at all. It is the
work of being a human being, a rational animal.
If you had four
eyes, and eight hands, and happened to be colored purple, but you were still
gifted with reason and choice, this would apply to you just as much.
The bitter
irony is that we will confidently speak about unity, but we still wallow in our
separation. We may tell someone to say or think what he believes is best, unless
we happen not to like what someone is saying or thinking.
We say we love,
of course, because others are human in theory, but we hate in practice, because
others don’t come from the right side of the tracks, or, more importantly, others
don’t think like us.
Have it one
way, or have it the other way, but you can’t play both sides. Love your
neighbor without condition, or feel free to attach all the conditions you like.
But don’t tell me there must be universal love, even as you yourself practice a
rather particular form of hate.
I know I am not
measured by my gender, race, color, height, or weight. I am measured by my virtue.
I often fail at that, as do you, and as does anyone. Shall we bicker about the
accidents? Move rather to the essence.
Once again, consider
what the Philosopher-Emperor actually said, and take that advice to heart. Love
others. Don’t be ruled by your emotions. Master your emotions through reason.
Think about how all of that fits into the big picture.
For anyone who
is still curious, I was given a verbal reprimand from the Dean for my “inappropriate”
statement.
The next week,
I put this on my little chalkboard:
Man
is the only creature who refuses to be what he is.
I know, I’m a
difficult sort of fellow. I am with Socrates, however, in asking people to
think for themselves, even if they sadly find it offensive.
Feel free to
hate me, but I still love you.
No comments:
Post a Comment