You are perhaps expecting the sect to utter such words as these: "It is base to flinch under a burden. Wrestle with the duties which you have once undertaken. No man is brave and earnest if he avoids danger, if his spirit does not grow with the very difficulty of his task."
Stoicism is indeed a philosophy that prescribes a full dose of fortitude, quite a welcome remedy for the usual frailty of bowing to convenience. I run the grave danger, however, of confusing the virtue of courage with the vice of insensitivity, and of twisting a commitment to my convictions into a callous bullying.
I imagine that Lucilius prefers the vigor of the Stoic message, yet even here Seneca continues to warn him about becoming thoughtless and reckless. The greater context is easily lost, such that confidence then outruns caring. Indeed, it turns out that restraint can often be the most profound form of bravery; how much more challenging it is to stand back than to fly off the handle!
I am especially wary of abusing Stoic principles as a pretext for a brutal machismo: then I might pretend I am righteous while I merely bask in my power. I sense a tickle of anger when I come across those who claim that being real men calls for imposing our desires and crushing our enemies, and now I am painfully aware of how easily I can fall for such boasting and raging.
The drive and the determination are only as good as the dignity of the ends to which they are directed. Be strong in being loving, be firm in offering forgiveness; this includes the tenacity to love and to forgive myself. Where is the gain, for anyone involved, if my judgment is a condemnation instead of an acceptance? What will become of me when the evenness of a Stoic indifference is reduced to a cruel disdain?
Toughness in winning riches and status is not fortitude, but folly. When I bemoan the hardship of being caught up in the lives of grasping men, this is now a sign of how I should carefully distance myself from their vain ambitions.
In this, the era of the "boss babe", there really ought to be a book of stoicism for housewives and stay at home moms.
ReplyDeleteThat's what came to mind for me reading this. From this perspective,being at home engaged in simple housework could actually be an advantage; in the culture at large, there's immense pressure to have some sort of professional prowess even if you stay at home with your kids.
You mention male machismo, there's a feminine version of that as well.
You are quite right, the temptation is universal to human nature! A man will be most familiar with the form of his own dispositions, of course, and is wise not to judge what he can only see from the outside :-)
DeleteI am honestly not familiar with the contents, but some people have spoken very well of the following blog:
http://www.thestoicmom.com
Perhaps it would be of interest to you? Hoping all is well!
I'll take a look at it, thanks. :)
DeleteWe're doing well. Up to three kiddos now, and life is full.