Building upon many years of privately shared thoughts on the real benefits of Stoic Philosophy, Liam Milburn eventually published a selection of Stoic passages that had helped him to live well. They were accompanied by some of his own personal reflections. This blog hopes to continue his mission of encouraging the wisdom of Stoicism in the exercise of everyday life. All the reflections are taken from his notes, from late 1992 to early 2017.
The Death of Marcus Aurelius
Friday, February 8, 2019
Ecclesiastes 2:4-8
[4] I made great works; I built houses and planted vineyards for myself;
[5] I made myself gardens and parks, and planted in them all kinds of fruit trees.
[6] I made myself pools from which to water the forest of growing trees.
[7] I bought male and female slaves, and had slaves who were born in my house; I had also great possessions of herds and flocks, more than any who had been before me in Jerusalem.
[8] I also gathered for myself silver and gold and the treasure of kings and provinces; I got singers, both men and women, and many concubines, man's delight.
Thursday, February 7, 2019
Boethius, The Consolation 3.12
“Though Nero decked himself proudly
with purple of Tyre and snow-white gems,
nonetheless that man of rage and luxury
lived ever hated of all.
Yet would that evil man at times
give his dishonored offices to men who
were revered.
Who then could count men blessed,
who to such a villain owed their high estate?”
—from
Book 3, Poem 4
It is
all too easy to see how the love of money burdens our lives, both for those who
receive less than they deserve and for those who receive more than they
deserve. This was one of the first things I noticed when I started trying to
figure out why the world worked, or didn’t work, as it did.
But
right there alongside a greed for possessions, just as prevalent if not even
more so, is the desire for status, the groveling for honors and positions, and
the privilege to brag about how highly we are held in esteem. After all, our
money is of little use if we can’t show it off to impress others with our
importance.
Money
and honor seem joined at the hip. They are both symptoms of the greater problem
Lady Philosophy is trying to teach us about, making the value of our lives
dependent on what is outside of us instead of what is inside of us, on what
fortune does for us instead of what virtue does for itself.
And just
as we can shamefully be quite satisfied to receive riches without questioning
where and how we acquired them, we will also accept praises and titles without
considering the worth of those who grant them.
A few
years back, a few of my colleagues were up for tenure, that Holy Grail of the
shallow academic. It seemed that for an entire year they would do anything to
impress the committee, even as they would regularly put down those same members
when they were out of earshot.
“If you
think so very poorly of these terrible people,” I once asked, ‘why do you care
so much about the prizes they can bestow on you?”
There
was one of those awkward moments of silence. “Well, that’s just how the game is
played.”
Exactly.
It often does seem much like playing a game, of the sort where we will do
anything to win points, without actually wondering who hands them out, or if we
deserve to receive them, or if they are even worth winning at all.
Where is
the value in being praised by a rake, promoted by a scoundrel, or rewarded by a
tyrant? What is given will only be as noble or as base as the giver; an honor
from a Nero actually ends up being more of an insult.
It is
odd that so many of what we say are the best of people are actually the worst
of people, and yet we will still go about trying to impress them. I remind
myself that I am better served by finding contentment in the merit of what I do
than in the image of what others think of what I do.
Written in 9/2015
The Art of Peace 8
Life is
growth. If we stop growing, technically and spiritually, we are as good as
dead. The Art of Peace is a celebration of the bonding of heaven, earth, and
humankind. It is all that is true, good, and beautiful.
Wednesday, February 6, 2019
Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 8.49
Remember
that the ruling faculty is invincible, when self-collected it is satisfied with
itself, if it does nothing that it does not choose to do, even if it resist
from mere obstinacy.
What
then will it be when it forms a judgment about anything aided by reason and
deliberately? Therefore the mind that is free from passions is a citadel, for
man has nothing more secure to which he can fly for refuge and for the future
be inexpugnable.
He
then who has not seen this is an ignorant man; but he who has seen it and does
not fly to this refuge is unhappy.
—Marcus
Aurelius, Meditations, Book 8 (tr
Long)
My own uncanny
ability to be quite a stubborn fellow, usually to my detriment, already tells
me how powerful the mind and the will can be. If I insist that my thoughts and
choices aren’t going to budge, they are most certainly not going to budge.
If I am just
being obstinate, of course, I am acting from a base instinct to puff myself up,
and I do so by standing against something, reveling in conflict and opposition.
There may not be much, if any, thinking going on at all. It is the sort of
strength that is quite brutal.
But now imagine
if that sort of commitment is joined together with a love of wisdom, informed
by conscience, and in the service of character. It can now become something
distinctly human. Driven by virtue instead of vanity, love instead of lust,
justice instead of anger, it no longer merely stands against something, but
rather works in conjunction with the good in all things. It goes with the grain
of Nature, not against it.
Take the sort
of strength we see in being merely stubborn, and let it be put in the service
of moral excellence. You now have a fortress that is truly unassailable.
Do I feel my
passions running away with me? Am I shackled by resentment, jealousy, or greed
to consume? Let sound judgment tame my passions, redirect them, and put them in
their rightful place. My reason, which can discover meaning and purpose in all
things, is my refuge from losing myself.
Do I feel
overwhelmed by my circumstances? Am I convinced I can longer bear being hated,
ignored, ridiculed, passed by, or abused? Let sound judgment temper my
circumstances, accept them for what they are, and find what is good in each and
every one of them. My reason, which can allow me to always depend only on the
virtue that is within my power, is my refuge from whatever may happen to me.
I need not
fear, despair, or surrender to my worst inclinations when I can find complete
safety and contentment within myself. There should be no anxiety about losing
what can’t be lost.
Written in 5/2008
Dhammapada 33
As a fletcher makes straight his arrow, a wise man makes straight his trembling and unsteady thought, which is difficult to guard, difficult to hold back.
I Don't Care!
My parents were never the spoiling sort, though they always gave me books upon books to help me understand. To this day, a book is a treasure to me.
Maurice Sendak was a writer I knew from the earliest age, and I was much the better for it. Many of my young friends had records from all the best pop bands of the time, but I recall that the only record I had back then was an album by Carole King, "Really Rosie", where she performed songs based on Sendak stories.
I cherished that old LP.
It popped back into my awareness the other day, when I read a claim by a woman who called herself a "modern" Stoic. "I am indifferent to what you say," she was telling someone. "I choose not to make your opinion matter to me. You are a symptom of entropy."
Now that's never how I understood Stoicism, because I always thought the idea of being indifferent to circumstances did not include rejecting others. Yet I notice that the new trend of Stoic indifference now becomes a justification for not caring.
Good Lord, no. The Stoic cares. He cares for all things, and his indifference is never about casting someone aside, but about seeing that any situation is never good or bad in itself; it rather becomes good by what we make of it through our judgments and actions.
It is never a no. It is always a yes.
Yet people say, "I don't care!" What a heartless expression.
I have been a Catholic for my whole life, and I have seen people sell my Faith for their utility. I have embraced Stoicism for half that life, but I also see people make use of it for their convenience.
To say " I am indifferent to you" is never the same as saying "I am indifferent to what happens to me." I am called to love you, even as I must accept that the world will be as it is. Stoicism is never an excuse for hatred or dismissal.
This song has it right. The moral of Pierre is: CARE!
Carole King, "Pierre", from Really Rosie (1975)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCEBLHd0v6I
There was once a boy named Pierre
Who only would say, I don't care!
Read his story, my friend, for you'll find
At the end that a suitable
Moral lies there
One day his mother said
When Pierre climbed out of bed
-Good morning, darling boy, you are my only joy
Pierre said-I don't care!
-What would you like to eat?
-I don't care!
-Some lovely cream of wheat?
-I don't care!
-Don't sit backwards in your chair
-I don't care!
-Or pour syrup on your hair
-I don't care!
-You are acting like a clown
-I don't care!
-And we have to go to town
-I don't care!
-Don't you want to come, my dear?
-I don't care!
-Would you rather stay right here?
-I don't care!
So his mother left him there
His father said-Get off your head
Or I will march you up to bed!
Pierre said-I don't care!
-I would think that you could see -
-I don't care!
-Your head is where your feet should be!
-I don't care!
-If you keep standing upside down -
-I don't care!
-We'll never get to town
-I don't care!
-If only you would say, I care
-I don't care!
-I'd let you fold the folding chair
-I don't care!
So his parents left him there
They didn't take him anywhere
Now as the night began to fall
A hungry lion paid a call
He looked Pierre right in the eye
And asked him if he'd like to die
Pierre said-I don't care!
-I can eat you, don't you see?
-I don't care!
-And you will be inside of me
-I don't care!
-Then you will never have to bother -
-I don't care!
-With a mother and a father
-I don't care!
-Is that all you have to say?
-I don't care!
-Then I'll eat you, if I may
-I don't care!
So the lion ate Pierre
Arriving home at six o'clock
His parents had a dreadful shock!
They found the lion sick in bed and cried
-Pierre is surely dead!
They pulled the lion by the hair
They hit him with the folding chair
His mother asked-Where is Pierre?
The lion answered-I don't care!
His father said-Pierre's in there!
They rushed the lion into town
The doctor shook him up and down
And when the lion gave a roar
Pierre fell out upon the floor
He rubbed his eyes and scratched his head
And laughed because he wasn't dead
His mother cried and held him tight
His father asked-Are you allright?
Pierre said-I am feeling fine
Please take me home, it's half past nine
The lion said-If you would care
To climb on me, I'll take you there
Then everyone looked at Pierre
Who shouted-Yes, indeed, I care!
The lion took them home to rest
And stayed on as a weekend guest
The moral of Pierre is: CARE!
Tuesday, February 5, 2019
Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 8.48
If
you are pained by any external thing, it is not this thing that disturbs you,
but your own judgment about it. And it is in your power to wipe out this
judgment now.
But
if anything in your own disposition gives you pain, who hinders you from correcting
your opinion? And even if you are pained because you are not doing some
particular thing that seems to you to be right, why do you not rather act than
complain?
“But
some insuperable obstacle is in the way!”
Do
not be grieved then, for the cause of its not being done depends not on you.
“But
it is not worthwhile to live, if this cannot be done!”
Take
your departure then from life contentedly, just as one who dies in full
activity, and well pleased too with the things that are obstacles.
—Marcus Aurelius,
Meditations, Book 8 (tr Long)
The Stoic claim
that it is within our power to modify our feelings by modifying our judgments
may seem quite absurd, especially when we are so accustomed to defining
ourselves as creatures dominated by passion. But we need not appeal only to
some noble theory here, as the proof is in the pudding. I must only observe
that the degree of how much I choose to value something in my thinking will
determine the degree to which I am affected by a feeling.
If I don’t like
cake, I won’t be angered when someone takes the last slice. If I’m into bird
watching, I will get quite excited when I spot an ivory-billed woodpecker.
I once knew a
fellow who was hopelessly enamored of a girl we knew. He would do anything he
could to win her attention, and tried again and again to make her jealous by
flirting with other women. The object of his affections wouldn’t bite, however,
and the reason was quite clear to all of us, thought it was hardly clear to
him: what he thought and did were not all that important in her estimation, and
so she hardly felt jealous about someone she didn’t consider seriously. How she
felt about him was in direct proportion to what she thought about him.
I will only
feel loss for something I think is valuable to me, and I will only feel desire
for something I think I need. Alter the judgment about what I believe to be
worth possessing, and I will alter the power of my want.
Now I never
think of this as being something as simple as turning feelings on and off, but
rather a matter of directing or giving meaning and purpose to how I feel. Both
the mind and the emotions can be complex, subtle, and mysterious, and it will
take focus and care to understand their ways.
A pain in my
body, arising from injury or disease, or a pleasure in my passions, arising
from my deepest instincts, may not be in my power to somehow stop and start.
But it is within my power to understand them, to put them in their place, to
control my reactions to them. I often think of this as the art of tempering how I feel.
It will indeed
often seem like something is blocking my way from contentment and serenity, but
I must simply ask myself if what I am doing, or what I am leaving undone, is
itself the obstacle. If so, I am more than able to remove it by my own
decision. If not, I should not allow what I cannot determine to trouble me.
Is the weight
of circumstances actually too much to bear? Then all that remains is for them
to destroy me, and even there I am more than able to bear the end with courage
and dignity. Even on my deathbed, or swallowed up by a broken heart, I remain
my own master.
Do I find
myself feeling discouraged because I am poor? Then I can stop thinking that
being rich is itself a worthy thing. Do I find myself distracted by lust? Then
I can assure myself that I am a man and not an animal. Do I find myself
saddened because I am not loved? Then I can start remembering that giving love
is greater than receiving it. The thinking will moderate the feeling.
The last
ivory-billed woodpecker has probably already passed away, but I’d like to think
he did so completely content with himself. I should want no less for myself.
Written in 5/2008
Epictetus, Golden Sayings 76
Monday, February 4, 2019
Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 8.47
Nothing
can happen to any man that is not a human accident, nor to an ox that is not
according to the nature of an ox, nor to a vine that is not according to the
nature of a vine, nor to a stone that is not proper to a stone.
If
then there happens to each thing both what is usual and natural, why should you
complain? For the Common Nature brings nothing which may not be borne by you.
—Marcus
Aurelius, Meditations, Book 8 (tr
Long)
We will speak
of nature in many ways, and we appeal to many aspects of the natural. We may
say that nature is a harmony or a balance, that which is pure and pristine,
free from impediment, the way the world works before any artificiality steps
in, the true direction everything has deep down to the core.
Many of the Ancients saw nature as
the guiding source of all action, the very expression of something’s essence. I
have long thought that Aristotle’s definition makes up in precision for what
some may say it lacks in poetry: “nature is a principle or cause of being moved and of being
at rest, in that to which it belongs primarily, in virtue of itself and not through
another.”
It is
accordingly proper that something behave according to its identity, that what
it does reflects what it is. A stone, a river, a vine, an ox, or
a man exist in harmony with their own natures, and the underlying Nature of all
things, when they fulfill their innate purpose. In the simplest sense, the
stone acts solidly, the river acts fluidly, the vine acts with nutrition,
growth, and reproduction, the ox further acts with sensation, the man acts even
further with reason and choice.
I appreciate
how Marcus Aurelius here highlights another piece to the whole order of Nature.
Not only will things act according to
their particular natures, in agreement with what they are, but they will also
be acted upon according to their
particular natures, in agreement with what they are. In other words, what a
stone, a river, a vine, an ox, or a man do
as well as what happens to them will
always work together.
I might think
it is somehow unnatural for a stone to be broken, or for a river to dry up, or
for a vine to be cut, or for an ox to be yoked, or for a man to suffer. Surely such circumstances will hinder each of these things from being what they are
intended to be? Not at all, because the conditions they must face are a very
part of what they are, and their responses are only possible through such a
process of change.
Let me look at
myself. I may understand that, as a creature of mind and will, I am here to
know the truth and love the good. But the loss of fortune, of pleasure, of
fame, of wealth, or of health seems to be standing in the way of my living
well, and so I might claim that pain, disgrace, poverty, or sickness are
unnatural to me.
Yet those
conditions can be perfectly natural to me, since I can still always make use of
them to live with wisdom and virtue, just as the vine can be natural if it is
pruned, or the ox if it is put to work in a field. What happens to me is never
unnatural, even as how I use my free choice to react to what happens could well
be unnatural.
Yes, it is even
natural for things to cease to be, just as it is natural for an animal to both
eat and be eaten, because it is natural for something new to grow out of
something old.
It is the order
of Providence, the unity of all things that Marcus Aurelius here calls
the Common Nature, that makes this possible. Nothing happens without purpose,
for good can always arise from any situation.
I should
therefore work with my own nature, and never against it, by embracing every
event as something I am made not merely to endure, but also to transform. My
complaints reflect poorly on what I do, not upon what is done to me.
Written in 5/2008
Thomas a Kempis, The Imitation of Christ 1.5
Of the reading of Holy Scriptures
1. It is Truth which we must look for in Holy Writ, not cunning of words. All Scripture ought to be read in the spirit in which it was written. We must rather seek for what is profitable in Scripture, than for what ministers to subtlety in discourse. Therefore we ought to read books which are devotional and simple, as well as those which are deep and difficult. And let not the weight of the writer be a stumbling-block to you, whether he be of little or much learning, but let the love of the pure Truth draw you to read. Ask not, who has said this or that, but look to what he says.
2. Men pass away, but the truth of the Lord endures forever. Without respect of persons God speaks to us in diverse manners. Our own curiosity often hinders us in the reading of holy writings, when we seek to understand and discuss, where we should pass simply on. If you would profit by your reading, read humbly, simply, honestly, and not desiring to win a character for learning. Ask freely, and hear in silence the words of holy men; nor be displeased at the hard sayings of older men than you, for they are not uttered without cause.
1. It is Truth which we must look for in Holy Writ, not cunning of words. All Scripture ought to be read in the spirit in which it was written. We must rather seek for what is profitable in Scripture, than for what ministers to subtlety in discourse. Therefore we ought to read books which are devotional and simple, as well as those which are deep and difficult. And let not the weight of the writer be a stumbling-block to you, whether he be of little or much learning, but let the love of the pure Truth draw you to read. Ask not, who has said this or that, but look to what he says.
2. Men pass away, but the truth of the Lord endures forever. Without respect of persons God speaks to us in diverse manners. Our own curiosity often hinders us in the reading of holy writings, when we seek to understand and discuss, where we should pass simply on. If you would profit by your reading, read humbly, simply, honestly, and not desiring to win a character for learning. Ask freely, and hear in silence the words of holy men; nor be displeased at the hard sayings of older men than you, for they are not uttered without cause.
Sunday, February 3, 2019
Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 8.46
Take
me and cast me where you wish; for there I shall keep my divine part tranquil,
that is, content, if it can feel and act conformably to its proper
constitution.
Is
this change of place sufficient reason why my soul should be unhappy and worse
than it was, depressed, expanded, shrinking, frightened? And what will you find
which is sufficient reason for this?
—Marcus
Aurelius, Meditations, Book 8 (tr
Long)
During what I
call my Wilderness Years, where I allowed myself to be overwhelmed by
loneliness and despair, I made a number of frantic efforts to keep myself
afloat. At one point, I dropped all my academic pretensions, and sought out
work that might better serve my soul.
I stumbled
across a chance to work in Catholic social services, and I jumped at it. Asked
which particular ministries interested me, I immediately chose AIDS patients and
prisoners. At that time, those who suffered from AIDS were largely considered
pariahs, just as those doing jail time still are to this day.
I somehow
figured, quite selfishly perhaps, that if I could work around that sort of
suffering, where others will barely consider you to be human, it might help me
to come to terms with my own suffering.
What I did not
expect was the degree to which the experience would affect me, and how it
continued changing me for years afterwards. I was forcefully pulled out of all
my first-world problems, and shown the bare bones of how other people face real
pain.
I slowly
observed that people weren’t made or broken by
suffering, but rather that they made or broke themselves through suffering. It wasn’t what happened to them, but what they
chose to do with what happened to them.
I hardly think
I ever helped anyone else, because I was really just a gofer, but many of those
people helped me. It was in hospitals and prisons that I saw both some of the
best and the worst in people; it was the judgment about circumstances that made
the difference.
The words of
Viktor Frankl, which had only been a profound abstraction before, were now
strikingly real:
The way in which a man accepts his fate and all the
suffering it entails, the way in which he takes up his cross, gives him ample
opportunity—even under the most difficult circumstances—to add a deeper meaning
to his life.
It
may remain brave, dignified and unselfish. Or in the bitter fight for
self-preservation he may forget his human dignity and become no more than an
animal.
Here
lies the chance for a man either to make use of or to forgo the opportunities
of attaining the moral values that a difficult situation may afford him. And
this decides whether he is worthy of his sufferings or not.
Wherever you
may put me, and under whatever conditions I must live, am I not still capable
of living with dignity and character? Yes, the outside may be chipped away, but
the inside can still flourish; in fact it can flourish all the more, because
greater hardship can actually offer an opportunity for greater virtue.
If I can
rightly understand what it is that gives my life meaning and value, the
excellence of my own attitude, I can recognize that I do not need to consider
any state of affairs to be too much to handle. The weight of circumstances and
the power of pain only have as much power as I permit them to have.
Do you choose
to treat me like an animal? You have made that choice. Now whether I choose to
also become like an animal, or thrive as a human being, is entirely my own
choice.
Written in 4/2008
Tao Te Ching 18
When the Great Tao ceased to be observed, benevolence and righteousness came into vogue. Then appeared wisdom and shrewdness, and there ensued great hypocrisy.
When harmony no longer prevailed throughout the six kinships, filial sons found their manifestation; when the states and clans fell into disorder, loyal ministers appeared.
Saturday, February 2, 2019
Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 8.45
See
that you secure this present time to yourself; for those who rather pursue
posthumous fame do not consider that the men of after time will be exactly such
as these whom they cannot bear now, and both are mortal.
And
what is it in any way to you if these men of after time utter this or that
sound, or have this or that opinion about you?
—Marcus
Aurelius, Meditations, Book 8 (tr
Long)
I have always
loved wandering through towns all over the world, not following some guidebook
that tells me where all the important sites are, but rather finding the obscure
corners, those wonderful places off the beaten path that show human life for
what it really is, in all of both its wonder and its grime.
On those
journeys I have stumbled across overgrown thickets that were once pristine parks,
crumbling buildings that were once mansions, and, perhaps the ones that move me
the most, statues and monuments erected to immortalize people now long
forgotten. Pull back the ivy, rub away the dirt from the inscription, and you
uncover snapshots of past worlds.
Some people
suggest that this would make them quite sad, and that my odd hobby might even be
rather pathetic, but I am not driven by melancholy or a romantic yearning for
the past. I am rather inspired by learning how the human condition is so much
the same at all times, even as each individual expression of human life is only
for a very brief time.
I suppose there
can be a certain sense of power, of immortality, in wanting to be remembered.
We become so accustomed to this goal of extending the mark of our existence as
long as possible, and so we think it tragic when such efforts fail. But there need
be no loss or sadness here, because the dignity of human life is never measured
by what other people think or say, and it is never measured by what may or may
not happen after a span of life has passed.
The dignity of living
is the living itself, and Nature has given this a proper limit. There is a
perfectly good reason the Stoic is not afraid of death, or cares nothing for
fame, or is unimpressed by fancy posturing. He understands that each moment can
be a perfect and complete present, the fullness of life. The weight of the past
and the worry for the future do not need to define it.
“But it is
gone!” Yes, it is gone. And look how glorious it was! It needs no encore beyond
what it was, when it was.
“But I won’t
matter anymore!” Yes, of course you will still matter, but not perhaps in the
way that you expect. Whether or not there is any further recognition has
nothing at all to do with your significance and worth in the order of things.
Am I living well
right now, the only thing within my power? The rest is just a diversion.
Written in 4/2008
Ecclesiastes 2:1-3
[1] I said to myself, "Come now, I will make a test of pleasure; enjoy yourself." But behold, this also was vanity.
[2] I said of laughter, "It is mad," and of pleasure, "What use is it?"
[3] I searched with my mind how to cheer my body with wine—my mind still guiding me with wisdom—and how to lay hold on folly, until I might see what was good for the sons of men to do under heaven during the few days of their life.
Friday, February 1, 2019
Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 8.44
Different
things delight different people; it is my delight to keep the ruling faculty
sound without turning away either from any man or from any of the things that
happen to men, but looking at and receiving all with welcome eyes and using
everything according to its value.
—Marcus
Aurelius, Meditations, Book 8 (tr
Long)
I’m always one
for being committed to what is true and good, and I am at the same time quite
wary of any sort of intellectual bullying. After all, I can hardly say that I
want other people to think for themselves, while simultaneously telling them exactly
what they must think. The truth should set you free, not make you my slave.
People will
seek joy in all sorts of ways. If they have come to know a better life, let me
be happy for them. If they have fallen into a worse life, let me suggest improvement
to them, not by dictating, but by the worth of my own example. Whatever I say
about happiness is meaningless if I myself am not living in happiness. Put your own house in order! Physician, heal
yourself!
So much of what
we believe will satisfy us seems to be built on the assumption of conflict. I
may think I need to always be fighting with myself, and to always be fighting
with other people. Now I will see that around me each and every day, and yet I don’t
see people finding any delight in this; they seem to be in a state of constant
anxiety.
Will it help if
I tell them how wrong they are, offering only another source of opposition and
strife? Or could I simply live in the way I find most delightful, hoping they
can see its merit for their own lives, while also being quite content if they
completely ignore me?
I don’t need to
be at war with myself. There is serenity within me when I choose to let reason
rule, when the inferior is ordered by the superior, the lesser measured
according to the greater. This means that I can only act for the good if I first understand
what is good, and the reasons why it is good. In this way, all circumstances
and all feelings can be of service to me, because I can know how they can be
directed to living well.
I don’t need to
be at war with others. If I can choose to rule myself, I can also respect the
manner in which others choose to rule themselves. Whether I believe they are
right or wrong, whatever they think and whatever they do only offers me a
greater opportunity to practice virtue for myself. They have their place in the
balance of all things, just as much as I have my place.
I try to
remember that a wise man, who surely will also be a loving man, and therefore
also a deeply contented man, will accept things as they are instead of casting
them aside, and will seek to find the good in things instead of dwelling upon
the evil. That is the sort of delight and serenity I’m seeking, where even a
cloudy or stormy day is a profoundly beautiful day.
Written in 4/2008
The Art of Peace 7
Eight forces sustain creation:
Movement and stillness,
Solidification and fluidity,
Extension and contraction,
Unification and division.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)











