And when the Lacedaemonians regarded him with amazement, he said: "This man I received from you an insolent and violent creature; I return him to you a reasonable man and a good citizen."
I know many people who define themselves almost completely by their political affiliations, and therefore usually, as I like to say, “start at the top” of any problem. Social matters are seen on a large scale, and so a conformity to certain sets of general dictates is the norm.
Has someone followed the rules? Then he should receive a prescribed pleasurable reward. Has someone broken the rules? Then he should be given a prescribed painful punishment. A belief in the “system”, of whatever sort, is paramount.
I do not deny the importance of such abstractions, but in daily life I find it far more helpful to start with people, not with “—isms”. I see something of this in the above story about Lycurgus, the founder of Spartan law.
Custom gave Lycurgus the power to determine the wrongdoer’s sentence, and I can imagine the usual options of a fine, or imprisonment, or a public caning, or perhaps even exile or execution.
And yet Lycurgus wasn’t interested in vengeance, or causing pain, or removing a criminal from society. He treated the young fellow like a human being, not like a faceless statistic, and was committed to improving his personal character, not beating him into submission.
No comments:
Post a Comment