The Death of Marcus Aurelius

The Death of Marcus Aurelius

Saturday, September 6, 2025

Chuang Tzu 6.6


There is the great Mass of nature—I find the support of my body on it; my life is spent in toil on it; my old age seeks ease on it; at death I find rest in it—what makes my life a good makes my death also a good. 

If you hide away a boat in the ravine of a hill, and hide away the hill in a lake, you will say that the boat is secure; but at midnight there shall come a strong man and carry it off on his back, while you in the dark know nothing about it. 

You may hide away anything, whether small or great, in the most suitable place, and yet it shall disappear from it. 

But if you could hide the world in the world, so that there was nowhere to which it could be removed, this would be the grand reality of the ever-during Thing. 

When the body of man comes from its special mould, there is even then occasion for joy; but this body undergoes a myriad transformations, and does not immediately reach its perfection—does it not thus afford occasion for joys incalculable? 

Therefore the sagely man enjoys himself in that from which there is no possibility of separation, and by which all things are preserved. He considers early death or old age, his beginning and his ending, all to be good, and in this other men imitate him—how much more will they do so in regard to That Itself on which all things depend, and from which every transformation arises! 

IMAGE: Shitao, Outing to Zhang Gong's Grotto (c. 1700) 



Cicero, Tusculan Disputations 5.22


M. Yet, how desirous he was of friendship, though at the same time he dreaded the treachery of friends, appears from the story of those two Pythagoreans: one of these had been security for his friend, who was condemned to die; the other, to release his security, presented himself at the time appointed for his dying: 
 
“I wish,” said Dionysius, “you would admit me as the third in your friendship.” 
 
What misery was it for him to be deprived of acquaintance, of company at his table, and of the freedom of conversation! Especially for one who was a man of learning, and from his childhood acquainted with liberal arts, very fond of music, and himself a tragic poet—how good a one is not to the purpose, for I know not how it is, but in this way, more than any other, everyone thinks his own performances excellent. 
 
I never as yet knew any poet (and I was very intimate with Aquinius), who did not appear to himself to be very admirable. The case is this: you are pleased with your own works; I like mine. 
 
But to return to Dionysius. He debarred himself from all civil and polite conversation, and spent his life among fugitives, bondmen, and barbarians; for he was persuaded that no one could be his friend who was worthy of liberty, or had the least desire of being free. 

—from Cicero, Tusculan Disputations 5.22 
 
It will be hard to convince the young go-getter that a mercenary life is a wretched life, since he sees all the glamor on the outside, and he still clings to a hope for some impending fulfillment on the inside. By the time he realizes why his urge to acquire and to consume can never be satisfied, he may no longer know how to escape from the prison of his own making; he is now nostalgic for the innocence he once shunned. 
 
Though hardly as dramatic in scale as the story of Dionysius, I have regularly noticed how the most prosperous people can also be the saddest and the loneliest people. At unexpected moments, they can express an urgent need for the simple comforts of honest companionship, almost as if they had regressed to being frightened children. Given their wealth and influence, I may resentfully wonder what else they could possibly desire, until I remember that they miss the plain exercise of their essential humanity. 
 
I was one of those odd children, already a rarity by my generation, who was still raised on German fairy tales and myths from the Greeks and Romans, so I was familiar with the fine story of Damon and Pythias, two Pythagoreans who ran afoul of Dionysius’ wrath. 
 
The tyrant sentenced Pythias to death, convinced that the young man was plotting against him. When Pythias begged for the chance to settle his affairs at home before the execution, Dionysius graciously permitted the request, but only on the condition that Damon stand in as a hostage. 
 
As the appointed time came, Pythias was nowhere to be found, and Dionysius, ever the cynic, assumed he had fled. As Damon was brought out to die in his place, Pythias suddenly arrived, apologized for his tardiness, explained how he had been waylaid by pirates, and thanked Damon for his faithfulness. 
 
It is said that Dionysius was so impressed by their nobility, that he immediately pardoned both men. It was then that he expressed his wish to join them in their friendship, a request which the men politely refused. Even when I first heard the story, I was sure they weren’t being rude, just painfully aware of why a wicked man is incapable of being a friend, having abandoned the sacred values of commitment and trust. 
 
We all crave fellowship, sometimes for the right reasons, and sometimes for the wrong reasons. While Dionysius briefly revealed his natural instinct to be as one with others, his weakness of character made it impossible for him to do so with devotion and constancy. By choosing to abandon virtue in favor of vice, for so many years, he had hardened himself to love, forever seeking utility at the expense of integrity. 
 
I was moved by the story back then, and I better understand its importance right now. I will be free when I have the decency to let others be free, to treat a man as a brother, not as a tool. Considered in this light, virtue is the strongest thing I can ever possess. 

—Reflection written in 2/1999 

IMAGE: Eloi-Firmin Féron, Damon and Pythias Before the Tyrant Dionysius (1826) 



Friday, September 5, 2025

Maxims of Goethe 73


Dilettantism treated seriously, and knowledge pursued mechanically, end by becoming pedantry. 

IMAGE: Thomas Rowlandson, The Pedant (c. 1800) 



Vivekachudamani 1-15


PROLOGUE 

I bow before Govinda, the objectless object of final success in the highest wisdom, who is supreme bliss and the true teacher.

For beings a human birth is hard to win, then manhood and holiness, then excellence in the path of wise law; hardest of all to win is wisdom. Discernment between Self and not-Self, true judgment, nearness to the Self of the Eternal and Freedom are not gained without a myriad of right acts in a hundred births. 

This triad that is won by the bright one's favor is hard to gain: humanity, aspiration, and rest in the great spirit. 

After gaining at last a human birth, hard to win, then manhood and knowledge of the teaching, if one strives not after Freedom he is a fool. He, suicidal, destroys himself by grasping after the unreal. Who is more self-deluded than he who is careless of his own welfare after gaining a hard-won human birth and manhood, too? 

Let them declare the laws, let them offer to the gods, let them perform all rites, let them love the gods; without knowing the oneness with the Self, Freedom is not won even in a hundred years of the Evolver. "There is no hope of immortality through riches," says the scripture. It is clear from this that rites cannot lead to Freedom. 

Therefore let the wise one strive after Freedom, giving up all longing for sensual self-indulgence; approaching the good, great Teacher, the Higher Self, with soul intent on the object of the teaching. 

Let him by the Self raise the Self, sunk in the ocean of the world, following the path of union through complete recognition of oneness. 

Setting all rites aside, let the wise, learned ones who approach the study of the Self strive for Freedom from the bondage of the world. Rites are to purify the thoughts, but not to gain the reality. 

The real is gained by Wisdom, not by a myriad of rites. When one steadily examines and clearly sees a rope, the fear that it is a serpent is destroyed. 

Knowledge is gained by discernment, by examining, by instruction, but not by bathing, nor gifts, nor a hundred holdings of the breath. 

Success demands first ripeness; questions of time and place are subsidiary. Let the seeker after self-knowledge find the Teacher, the Higher Self, full of kindness and knowledge of the Eternal. 

—all of the passages in this series are taken from the translation of the Vivekachudamani by Charles Johnston (1946). The original romanization has been retained. 



Thursday, September 4, 2025

Delphic Maxims 82


Γλῶτταν ἴσχε 
Restrain the tongue 

IMAGE: Jean Raoux, The Silence (c. 1700) 



Cicero, Tusculan Disputations 5.21


M. This tyrant, however, showed himself how happy he really was; for once, when Damocles, one of his flatterers, was dilating in conversation on his forces, his wealth, the greatness of his power, the plenty he enjoyed, the grandeur of his royal palaces, and maintaining that no one was ever happier, “Have you an inclination,” said he, “Damocles, as this kind of life pleases you, to have a taste of it yourself, and to make a trial of the good fortune that attends me?” 
 
And when he said that he should like it extremely, Dionysius ordered him to be laid on a bed of gold with the most beautiful covering, embroidered and wrought with the most exquisite work, and he dressed out a great many sideboards with silver and embossed gold. 
 
He then ordered some youths, distinguished for their handsome persons, to wait at his table, and to observe his nod, in order to serve him with what he wanted. There were ointments and garlands; perfumes were burned; tables provided with the most exquisite meats. Damocles thought himself very happy. 
 
In the midst of this apparatus, Dionysius ordered a bright sword to be let down from the ceiling, suspended by a single horsehair, so as to hang over the head of that happy man. 
 
After which he neither cast his eye on those handsome waiters, nor on the well-wrought plate; nor touched any of the provisions: presently the garlands fell to pieces. At last, he entreated the tyrant to give him leave to go, for that now he had no desire to be happy. 
 
Does not Dionysius, then, seem to have declared there can be no happiness for one who is under constant apprehensions? But it was not now in his power to return to justice, and restore his citizens their rights and privileges; for, by the indiscretion of youth, he had engaged in so many wrong steps and committed such extravagances, that, had he attempted to have returned to a right way of thinking, he must have endangered his life. 

—from Cicero, Tusculan Disputations 5.21 
 
I usually take this story as reflecting poorly on Damocles, for being so foolish as to believe that privilege brings peace, so I forget to spare a thought for the tragic Dionysius, who has so bound himself up in power and wealth that he can no longer extricate himself from a life of anxiety. After all, what worse fate could befall a man than constantly being a slave to everyone else’s whims? 
 
Now I’m not sure if everything I needed to know I learned in kindergarten, but there were so many childhood experiences that already gave me a good sense of which way is up. My problems inevitably arose when I ignored these lessons, by arrogantly assuming the answers weren’t supposed to be plain and simple. I increasingly find age merely reminding me of the truths I had learned long ago, even if I couldn’t put them into fancy words. 
 
Back in the second and third grades, I would sometimes spend the afternoon at the homes of two classmates. Though they lived only a block away from each other, their circumstances could hardly have been more different. The first lived in a mansion on the top of a hill, and the second lived in a cramped basement apartment. The first had a father who was an esteemed lawyer, involved in local politics, and the second had never met his father. Was it odd, then, that the first boy was a nervous wreck, and the second always found reasons to be cheerful? 
 
I do not wish to suggest that being rich ruined the one, and being poor redeemed the other, but rather that the things these respective families chose to care about would determine their happiness or misery. I could see it then in the ways they treated one another, and I understand it more now from my own years of struggle. Your values will make you, not your fortune. 
 
Like so many of us, Damocles was impressed by luxury, and he hoped that sweet-talking the boss could give him a leg up. Yet Dionysius had learned the hard way how a man should be careful with his wishes, and whether it was out of kindness or out of spite, he stripped the toady of his illusions. You must only scratch the surface of a grasping man to find a wretched man, for he is desperate to fill the emptiness in his soul with the diversions of comfort and clout. 
 
Those of us left from the old neighborhood will awkwardly avoid speaking about the family on the hill, because their personal troubles only grew and grew. I unfortunately lost touch with the boy in the basement for a time, after their landlord evicted them, only to recently run into him at the grocery store. He was working as a mechanic, still lived with his mother, and immediately asked me and my new wife over for dinner. 
 
Even as I would like to think it is never too late to recover a decency of character out of a morass of excesses, the best option is to never get entangled in a life of avarice to begin with. In clinging to our spoils, we risk losing ourselves. 

—Reflection written in 2/1999 

IMAGE: Richard Westall, The Sword of Damocles (1812) 



Wednesday, September 3, 2025

Dio Chrysostom, On Tyranny 3


"Still, all human ills admit of this one consolation," continued Diogenes—"they may possibly come to an end. The prisoner in chains expects some time to be set free; it is not impossible for the exile to return to his home; and he who is sick can hope until the end comes for recovery. 

"But the tyrant may not escape his condition; no, he cannot even so much as pray except it be for something else. Anyone who has suffered the loss of a friend by death believes in his heart that time will eventually heal his grief; but tyrants, on the contrary, find their troubles growing worse and worse; since it is not easy for a tyrant to reach old age, and a tyrant's old age is grievous, unlike that of the horse in the proverb.⁠ For his victims as well as those who despise him have multiplied, and he, owing to his own infirmities, cannot defend himself. 

"Now all calamities are naturally more alarming in anticipation than they are grievous in experience, as is true of hunger, exile, imprisonment, or loss of civil rights; but if the fear of death were removed, then no further distress remains. For death in itself is so far from troubling those who have experienced it, that they have no further grief at all. 

"Fear of it, however, is so intense that many have anticipated the event. People on a storm-tossed ship have not waited for it to go down but have taken their own lives first; others have done the same when surrounded by the enemy, although they well knew that nothing worse than death awaited them. 

"This is the evil plight that despots are ever in, both by day and by night. For condemned criminals a stated day is set on which they must die, but tyrants are uncertain whether death will come soon or the hour has already struck. No moment, not even the most fleeting, is free from this dread, but whether eating or sacrifi­cing to the gods the tyrant must live in this fear. 

"And if ever it occurs to such a ruler to seek diversion, even in the enjoyments of love, no matter how intense the passion, his mind dwells on death, imagining that perhaps he will be slain by the very object of his love, and with this fear he must quaff his wine and with it must lay himself down to sleep. And so, in my opinion, the tyrant is happy only at the moment when he is struck down, since it is then that he is freed from his greatest evil. 

"But the most absurd thing of all is this: Other men realize that their condition is hopeless and so do not suffer long when death is possible for them; but tyrants, though suffering from the greatest evils, imagine that they are surrounded by the greatest blessings, presumably because they are deceived by the opinions of others who have not had experience of ruling. God has inflicted tyrants with this ignorance that they may hold out under their punishment. 

"Again, to the prosperous life seems more worth living and death correspondingly more bitter, while those in adversity seem to find life harder to endure and to welcome death more gladly. But for tyrants both are harder than for others, since in life they have far less happiness than those who eagerly long to die, and yet they fear death as if they were getting the greatest enjoyment out of life. 

"And if things pleasurable naturally afford greater delight when they are rare, but become repulsive to those who have the continuous enjoyment of them, and if evils that never cease are naturally harder to bear; then we may almost say that both these—the pleasurable and the painful—are always with the tyrant in such a way that he rarely finds relief from pain and is never conscious of pleasure. 

"Besides, he continually dreads the power of the rich and the craving of the poor for riches. Again, despots are the only persons who receive no thanks for the favors they bestow; since people never think they get enough, while those who fail to get what they want hate them above all others. 

"The most disliked man, too, is he who has acquired great wealth unjustly; hence no man is more disliked than a tyrant. And furthermore, he is obliged to show favors to those about him, otherwise he will perish most speedily. But it is not easy to give to many repeatedly without taking from others. 

"Accordingly, the men whom he despoils are his enemies, while his beneficiaries eye him with suspicion and seek to be rid of him as soon as possible. What is far removed from him he fears because of its remoteness; what is near, because it is close to him; from those at a distance he looks for war, from those near at hand, treachery. 

"Peace he considers undesirable because it leaves men idle, and war, because he is obliged to disturb his subjects by raising money and compelling them to take the field as well. So when there is a war, tyrants want peace; and when peace has been made, they at once scheme for war. When the people have all the comforts of life, they fear their insolence; when hard times come, they fear their wrath. They feel that it is safe neither to leave the country nor to stay the home, neither to appear in public nor to live in seclusion, nay, not even to set foot where they may do so in safety, and that plotting and treachery menace them on every side. 

"Every one of them calls to mind the deaths of tyrants and all the conspiracies that have ever been formed against them; he imagines that they are all coming his way, and is terror-stricken as if he were doomed to all those deaths; and he is always wanting to look on every side and to turn around, as though he might be struck from any quarter; but this is the very thing he may not do from shame and fear at once. 

"For the more apparent the tyrant's fear, the more do men conspire against him through scorn of his cowardice. He lives, therefore, like one shut up in a narrow cell with swords hanging over his head and others, just touching the skin, fixed all about him. So closely indeed about the tyrant's soul as well as his body are the swords set that Tantalus in Hades has a far easier time of it, Tantalus, who is said 

to dread the rock that sways above his head. 

"Tantalus at least has no further dread of death, while the tyrant suffers in life that fate which men ascribe to Tantalus in the other world. 

"Now for those who have made themselves tyrants of but a single city or a small country, it is not impossible to flee from their realm and live in seclusion elsewhere—yet no one has any fondness for a tyrant, but only hatred and suspicion, and everyone is ready to surrender him to his victims—those, however, who rule over many cities and peoples and over a boundless territory, as the Persian king does, cannot escape, even though they come to comprehend their evil plight and some god remove their ignorance from them. It seems, then, that the tyrant's life would never be safe, not even if he were to become bronze or iron, but that even then he would be destroyed by being broken to pieces or melted down. 

"If you talk with him boldly, he is angered and fears your frankness; if you converse with him meekly and deferentially, he suspects your meekness. He feels that he is being insulted by those who treat him as an equal and deceived by those who are more obsequious. Censure, too, stings him far more than it does others because he, a sovereign, is spoken ill of; nor is he pleased with praise either, for he does not think that the speaker is sincere in his praise. Then, of the fairest and most useful of all treasures he has the greatest lack; for friendship and good-will he can expect from no one; nay, keepers of savage lions will love these brutes sooner than they who court and approach tyrants will love them. 

"I, however," says Diogenes, "go by night whithersoever I will and travel by day unattended, and I am not afraid to go even through an army if need be, without the herald's staff, yea, and amid brigands; for I have no enemy, public or private, to block my way. 

"If all the gold, all the silver, and all the copper should give out, that would not injure me in the least. And if an earthquake lays all the houses low as happened once in Sparta,⁠ and all the sheep are killed so that not a single man has wherewithal to clothe himself, and want overwhelms not only Attica but Boeotia as well and the Peloponnesus and Thessaly, as it is said to have done aforetime, I shall fare none the worse nor be the more destitute.⁠ 

"For how much more naked shall I be than I am now, how much more homeless? I shall find all the food I need in apples, millet, barley, vetches, the cheapest of lentils, acorns roasted in the ashes, and cornel-berries, on which Homer⁠ says Circe feasted Odysseus' comrades and on which even the largest animals can subsist." 

Sayings of Ramakrishna 270


If God is Omnipresent, why do we not see Him? 

Standing by the bank of a pool thickly overspread with scum and weeds, you will say that there is no water in it. 

If you desire to see the water, remove the scum from the surface of the pond. 

With eyes covered with the film of Mâyâ you complain that you cannot see God. 

If you wish to see Him, remove the film of Mâyâ from off your eyes. 

IMAGE: Amardas Bhatti, Prince Subuddhi Meets Shiva in the Forest of Illusion (1830)



Wisdom from the Early Cynics, Diogenes 36


When someone declared that life is an evil, Diogenes corrected him: "Not life itself, but living ill." 

When he was advised to go in pursuit of his runaway slave, he replied, "It would be absurd, if Manes can live without Diogenes, but Diogenes cannot get on without Manes." 

When breakfasting on olives amongst which a cake had been inserted, he flung it away and addressed it thus: 

Stranger, betake thee from the princes' path! 

And on another occasion thus:

He lashed an olive.

Being asked what kind of hound he was, he replied, "When hungry, a Maltese; when full, a Molossian—two breeds which most people praise, though for fear of fatigue they do not venture out hunting with them. 

"So neither can you live with me, because you are afraid of the discomforts."

—Diogenes Laërtius, 6.55  

IMAGE: D.E. Pugons, Dog Begging Diogenes (1902) 



Tuesday, September 2, 2025

Dio Chrysostom, On Tyranny 2


In such language Diogenes at times used to ridicule the victims of conceit and folly, though it was against the sophists, who wanted to be looked up to and thought they knew more than other men, that he railed in particular. 

He used to say that men, owing to their softness, lived more wretched lives than the beasts. For these took water for their drink and grass for their food, were most of them naked from one end of the year to the other, never entered a house nor made any use of fire, and yet they lived as long as nature had ordained for each, if no one destroyed them, and all alike remained strong and healthy, and had no need of doctors or of drugs.⁠ 

Men, however, who are so very fond of life and devise so many ways to postpone death, generally did not even reach old age, but lived infested by a host of maladies which it were no easy task even to name, and the earth did not supply them with drugs enough, but they required the knife and cautery as well. 

Nor were Cheiron⁠ and Asclepius' sons,⁠ with all their healing power, nor prophetic seers nor priestly exorcists of any use to them at all because of their excesses and wickedness. Men crowded into the cities to escape wrong from those outside, only to wrong one another and commit all sorts of the most dreadful misdeeds as though that had been the object of their coming together. 

And the reason, in his opinion, why the myth says that Zeus punished Prometheus for his discovery and bestowal of fire was that therein lay the origin and beginning of man's softness and love of luxury; for Zeus surely did not hate men or grudge them any good thing.

When some people urged that it is impossible for man to live like the animals owing to the tenderness of his flesh and because he is naked and unprotected either by hair, as the majority of beasts are, or by feathers and has no covering of tough skin, he would say in reply that men are so very tender because of their mode of life, since, as a rule, they avoid the sun and also avoid the cold. It is not the nakedness of the body that causes the trouble. 

He would then call attention to the frogs and numerous other animals much more delicate than man and much less protected, and yet some of them not only withstand the cold air but are even able to live in the coldest water during the winter. 

He also pointed out that the eyes and the face of man himself have no need of protection. And, in general, no creature is born in any region that cannot live in it. Else how could the first human beings to be born have survived, there being no fire, or houses, or clothing, or any other food than that which grew wild? 

Nay, man's ingenuity and his discovering and contriving so many helps to life had not been altogether advantageous to later generations, since men do not employ their cleverness to promote courage or justice, but to procure pleasure. And so, as they pursue the agreeable at any cost, their life becomes constantly less agreeable and more burdensome; and while they appear to be attending to their own needs, they perish most miserably, just because of excessive care and attention. And for these reasons Prometheus was justly said to have been bound to the rock and to have had his liver plucked by the eagle.

Things, therefore, that were costly or demanded constant attention and worry he rejected and showed to be injurious to those who used them; but whatever could readily and without effort help the body to withstand the winter's cold or hunger or to satisfy some other appetite of the body, he would never forgo; nay, he would choose localities that were healthful in preference to the unhealthy, and those that were adapted to the different seasons, and he took care to have a sufficient supply of food and moderate clothing, but from public affairs, lawsuits, rivalries, wars, and factions he kept himself clear. 

He tried especially to imitate the life of the gods, for they alone, as Homer asserts,⁠ live at ease, implying that the life of man is full of labor and hardship. Even the lower animals, he claimed, understand this sort of thing clearly. 

The storks, for example, leave the heat of the summer and migrate to a temperate climate, and after spending as long a time there as is most congenial to them, depart in flocks, retreating before the winter; while cranes, which stand the winter fairly well, come at seeding time and for the food they pick up. Deer and hares come down from the mountains into the plains and valleys in the cold weather and find shelter there in comfortable nooks away from the wind, but in the hot season withdraw into the woods and the most northerly regions. 

When, therefore, he observed how other men were harassed throughout their whole lives, ever plotting against one another, ever encompassed by a thousand ills and never able to enjoy a moment's rest, nay, not even during the great festivals nor when they proclaimed a truce; and when he beheld that they did or suffered all this simply in order to keep themselves alive, and that their greatest fear was lest their so‑called necessities should fail them, and how, furthermore, they planned and strove to leave great riches to their children, he marveled that he too did not do the like, but was the only independent man in the world, and that nobody else had any comprehension of his own highest happiness. 

For these reasons he refused to compare himself any farther⁠ with the king of the Persians, since there was a great difference between them. In fact, the king was, he said, the most miserable man alive, fearing poverty in spite of all his gold, fearing sickness and yet unable to keep away from the things that cause it, in great dread of death and imagining that everybody was plotting against him,⁠ even his own sons and his brothers. 

So the despot could neither eat with pleasure, though the most tempting dishes were placed before him, nor drown his troubles in wine. Not a day did he pass "at ease" in which he looked about without suffering torments. When sober, he longed for intoxication in the belief that he would then have relief from his misfortunes, and when drunk, he imagined himself to be ruined just because he was unable to help himself. And further, when awake, he prayed for sleep that he might forget his fears, but when asleep he would immediately leap up, imagining that his very dreams were killing him; and neither the golden plane-tree,⁠ nor the mansions of Semiramis, nor the walls of Babylon were of any help to him. 

The most absurd thing of all, however, was that, though he feared unarmed persons, yet he entrusted himself to his armed guards, that though he searched those who approached him to see if any had a weapon, yet he lived surrounded by men who carried weapons. He was forever fleeing from the unarmed to the armed and from the armed to the unarmed; from the people he protected himself by means of his bodyguard and from his bodyguard by means of his eunuchs. 

He had no one that he could trust, nor refuge to which he could turn so that he might live a single day without fear. He suspected everything he ate or drank, and had men to sample things for him like so many scouts on a road beset by the enemy. Nay, he could not place confidence in his nearest and dearest, whether children or wife. Yet, difficult and grievous as the position of monarch was, he never wanted to get rid of it, nor could be. 



Stoic Snippets 269


See what things are in themselves, dividing them into matter, form, and purpose. 

—Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 12.10 

IMAGE: James Tissot, The Creation (c. 1900) 



Wisdom from the Early Stoics, Zeno of Citium 76


Again, the Stoics say that the wise man never wonders at any of the things which appear extraordinary, such as Charon’s mephitic caverns, ebbings of the tide, hot springs, or fiery eruptions. 

Nor yet, they go on to say, will the wise man live in solitude; for he is naturally made for society and action. He will, however, submit to training to augment his powers of bodily endurance. 

And the wise man, they say, will offer prayers, and ask for good things from the gods: so Posidonius in the first book of his treatise On Duties, and Hecato in his third book On Paradoxes

Friendship, they declare, exists only between the wise and good, by reason of their likeness to one another. And by friendship they mean a common use of all that has to do with life, wherein we treat our friends as we should ourselves. 

They argue that a friend is worth having for his own sake and that it is a good thing to have many friends. But among the bad there is, they hold, no such thing as friendship, and thus no bad man has a friend. 

Another of their tenets is that the unwise are all mad, inasmuch as they are not wise but do what they do from that madness which is the equivalent of their folly. 

—Diogenes Laërtius, 7.123-124 

IMAGE: Benjamin Heinrich Orth, Three Friends (1835) 



Monday, September 1, 2025

Dio Chrysostom, On Tyranny 1


When Diogenes of Sinope was exiled from that place, he came to Greece and used to divide his time between Corinth and Athens. And he said he was following the practice of the Persian king.⁠ For that monarch spent the winters in Babylon and Susa, or occasionally in Bactra,⁠ which are the warmest parts of Asia, and the summers in Median Ecbatana,⁠ where the air is always very cool and the summer is like the winter in the region of Babylon. So he too, he said, changed his residence according to the seasons of year. 

For Attica had no high mountains, nor rivers running through it as had the Peloponnese and Thessaly; its soil was thin and the air so dry that rain rarely fell, and what did fall was not retained. Besides, it was almost entirely surrounded by the sea; from which fact indeed it got its name, since Attica is a sort of beach-land.⁠ The city, moreover, was low-lying and faced to the south, as shown by the fact that those sailing from Sunium could not enter the Peiraeus⁠ except with a south wind. Naturally, therefore, the winters were mild. 

In Corinth, on the other hand, the summer was breezy, since currents of air always met there on account of the bays that dented the shore. The Acrocorinthus,⁠too, overshadows it, and the city itself rather inclines toward the Lechaeum⁠ and the north. 

Diogenes thought that these cities were far more beautiful than Ecbatana and Babylon, and that the Craneion,⁠ and the Athenian acropolis with the Propylaea⁠ were far more beautiful structures than those abodes of royalty, yielding to them only in size. And yet the circumference of Athens was two hundred stades,⁠ now that the Peiraeus and the connecting walls had been added to the compass of the city—for this whole area was not inhabited in ancient times—so that Athens was one-half as large as Babylon, if we could take as true what was said of things there. 

Moreover, in respect to the beauty of the harbors, and, further, to the statues, paintings, the works in gold, silver, and bronze, in respect to the coinage, the furnishings, the splendour of the houses, he thought that Athens was far superior; only he, for his part, did not care much about such things. 

Besides, the king had a very long distance to travel in changing residences; he had to spend pretty much the larger part of the winter and summer on the road. He himself, on the other hand, by spending the night near Megara, could very easily be in Athens on the following day—or else, if he preferred, at Eleusis; otherwise, he could take a shorter way through Salamis,⁠ without passing through any deserts. 

So he had an advantage over the king and enjoyed greater luxury, since his housing arrangements were better. This is what he was wont to say jestingly, and yet he meant to bring to the attention of those who admired the wealth of the Persian and his reputed happiness that there was nothing in his actual life such as they imagined. For some things were of no use at all and other things were within the reach of even the very poor. 

In fact, Diogenes was not neglect­ful of his body as certain foolish people thought; but when they saw him often shivering and living in the open and going thirsty, they imagined that he was careless of his health and life, whereas this rigorous regime gave him better health than fell to the lot of those who were ever gorging themselves, better than fell to the lot of those who stayed indoors and never experienced either cold or heat. 

And he got more pleasure, too, out of sunning himself and more pleasure in eating his food than they did. But the seasons were by far his greatest delight. On the one hand, he rejoiced as the summer approached and was already dissolving the cold air; and on the other, he felt no regret as it drew to its close, since this brought him relief from its excessive heat; and by keeping pace with the seasons and growing accustomed to them gradually, he met either extreme without discomfort. 

He rarely made use of heat, shade, or shelter in anticipation of the proper seasons for them, nor did he do as others do, who, because they may light a fire any time and are well supplied with clothes and own houses, run away at once from the open air at the least sensation of cold, thus enfeebling their bodies and making them incapable of enduring the winter's cold, or, on the other hand, because it is possible for them to enjoy abundant shade in the summer-time and drink all the wine they wish, on that account never expose themselves to the sun, never experience a natural thirst, keep to the house just as much as women do, are inactive and sluggish of body, and have their souls steeped in a drunken stupor. 

This is why they devise for themselves both unwholesome menus and baths to counteract the bad effects of these,⁠ and within the same twenty-four hours they often want both a breeze and heavy clothing; they want ice and fire at one and the same time, and—what is most absurd of all—they long for both hunger and thirst. And though they are incontinent, they find no delight in love because they do not wait till they desire it naturally; consequently the pleasures they seek are devoid of satisfaction and are joyless. 

Diogenes, however, always waited until he was hungry or thirsty before he partook of nourishment, and he thought that hunger was the most satisfactory and pungent of appetizers. And so he used to partake of a barley cake with greater pleasure than others did of the costliest of foods, and enjoyed a drink from a stream of running water more than others did their Thasian wine. 

He scorned those who would pass by a spring when thirsty and move heaven and earth to find where they could buy Chian or Lesbian wine; and he used to say that such persons were far sillier than cattle, since these creatures never pass by a spring or a clear brook when thirsty or, when hungry, disdain the tenderest leaves or grass enough to nourish them. 

He also said that the most beautiful and healthful houses were open to him in every city: to wit, the temples and the gymnasia. And one garment was all he needed for both summer and winter, for he endured the cold weather easily because he had become used to it. He never protected his feet, either, because they were no more sensitive, he claimed, than his eyes and face. For these parts, though by nature most delicate, endured the cold very well on account of their constant exposure; for men could not possibly walk after binding their eyes as they did their feet. He used to say, too, that rich men were like newborn babes; both were in constant need of swaddling-clothes. 

That for which men gave themselves the most trouble and spent the most money, which caused the razing of many cities and the piti­ful destruction of many nations—this he found the least laborious and most inexpensive of all things to procure. For he did not have to go anywhere for his sexual gratification but, as he humorously put it, he found Aphrodite everywhere, without expense; and the poets libeled the goddess, he maintained, on account of their own want of self-control, when they called her "the all-golden."⁠ 

And since many doubted this boast, he gave a public demonstration before the eyes of all, saying that if men were like himself, Troy would never have been taken, nor Priam, king of the Phrygians and a descendant of Zeus, been slain at the altar of Zeus. But the Achaeans had been such fools as to believe that even dead men found women indispensable and so slew Polyxena at the tomb of Achilles. Fish showed themselves more sensible than men almost; for whenever they needed to eject their sperm, they went out of doors and rubbed themselves against something rough. 

He marveled that while men were unwilling to pay out money to have a leg or arm or any other part of their body rubbed, that while not even the very rich would spend a single drachma for this purpose, yet on that one member they spent many talents time and again and some had even risked their lives in the bargain. 

In a joking way he would say that this sort of intercourse was a discovery made by Pan when he was in love with Echo and could not get hold of her, but roamed over the mountains night and day till Hermes in pity at his distress, since he was his son, taught him the trick. So Pan, when he had learned his lesson, was relieved of his great misery; and the shepherds learned the habit from him. 



I Will Not Hurry




Dhammapada 404


Him I call indeed a Brahmana who keeps aloof both from laymen and from mendicants, who frequents no houses, and has but few desires. 

IMAGE: Philip James de Loutherbourg, The Hermit (1798) 



Cicero, Tusculan Disputations 5.20


M. Dionysius exercised his tyranny over the Syracusans thirty-eight years, being but twenty-five years old when he seized on the government. How beautiful and how wealthy a city did he oppress with slavery! And yet we have it from good authority that he was remarkably temperate in his manner of living, that he was very active and energetic in carrying on business, but naturally mischievous and unjust; from which description everyone who diligently inquires into truth must inevitably see that he was very miserable. 
 
Neither did he attain what he so greatly desired, even when he was persuaded that he had unlimited power; for, notwithstanding he was of a good family and reputable parents (though that is contested by some authors), and had a very large acquaintance of intimate friends and relations, and also some youths attached to him by ties of love after the fashion of the Greeks, he could not trust any one of them, but committed the guard of his person to slaves, whom he had selected from rich men’s families and made free, and to strangers and barbarians. 
 
And thus, through an unjust desire of governing, he in a manner shut himself up in a prison. Besides, he would not trust his throat to a barber, but had his daughters taught to shave; so that these royal virgins were forced to descend to the base and slavish employment of shaving the head and beard of their father. Nor would he trust even them, when they were grown up, with a razor; but contrived how they might burn off the hair of his head and beard with red-hot nutshells. 
 
And as to his two wives, Aristomache, his countrywoman, and Doris of Locris, he never visited them at night before everything had been well searched and examined. And as he had surrounded the place where his bed was with a broad ditch, and made a way over it with a wooden bridge, he drew that bridge over after shutting his bedchamber door. 
 
And as he did not dare to stand on the ordinary pulpits from which they usually harangued the people, he generally addressed them from a high tower. And it is said that when he was disposed to play at ball—for he delighted much in it—and had pulled off his clothes, he used to give his sword into the keeping of a young man whom he was very fond of. 
 
On this, one of his intimates said pleasantly, “You certainly trust your life with him;” and as the young man happened to smile at this, he ordered them both to be slain, the one for showing how he might be taken off, the other for approving of what had been said by smiling. But he was so concerned at what he had done that nothing affected him more during his whole life; for he had slain one to whom he was extremely partial. 
 
Thus do weak men’s desires pull them different ways, and while they indulge one, they act counter to another. 

—from Cicero, Tusculan Disputations 5.20 
 
I am hesitant to paint public figures as either heroes or villains, because I do not necessarily perceive the inner workings of their hearts and minds, and because I know the danger of making hasty generalizations out of an obedience to the clan. If I listened to the holy rollers, I would have to believe that Padre Pio was incapable of harming a fly, and if I listened to the hipsters, I would have to believe that Reagan ate babies for breakfast. 
 
Nevertheless, there are certain warning signs for a troubled soul, and while I am most familiar with the petty tyrants who terrorize offices and schools, Cicero’s description of Dionysius sounds awfully familiar. Whatever the scale, those who are enslaved to their cravings are also plagued by anxiety and discontent; they are cursed by the failure of trying to fill the needs of nature with the diversions of fortune, and for all that they acquire and consume, they remain painfully dissatisfied.
 
I see it in others on each and every day, and I have felt it within myself during those nightmarish times when I have foolishly jumped on the bandwagon. Though I have never possessed as much as Dionysius of Syracuse, I know all too well how longing grows into a wasting disease, and rage becomes a chronic reaction to the constant disappointments. The haughtiness on the outside is a cover for the pain on the inside. 
 
I didn’t believe my mother when she told me how the bullies were secretly jealous, but it turns out she was completely right. I wondered what I had that they could possibly want, failing to realize why the mere presence of anything outside of their power will feed their fury. Some will cry out when their urges aren’t fulfilled, and others will lash out, and only a few will choose the wisdom to tame their urges. 
 
While pop psychology may offhandedly label Dionysius with a bad case of paranoia, no model of behavior can function without a moral foundation. The extreme suspicion proceeds out of an intense fear of loss, which in turn follows from mistakenly placing happiness in the circumstances beyond our control. As long as the core values are not altered, the lust will not cease to devour, and the grief will continue to grow. 
 
In desiring what is unreliable, a love can never be consummated; in divorcing action from conscience, the mind can never be at peace. Where friendship is conditional, everyone eventually becomes an enemy; where judgment yields to resentment, there is no end to our regrets.
 
Again, the pop psychology will tell us to be happy by “feeling good” about ourselves, even as it neglects to explain what can truly bring such a harmony to our souls. Where an understanding of the good is lacking, the passions will lead us in conflicting directions, and we will be ripped apart by pursuing all the wrong goals, for all the wrong reasons, with all the wrong people. 
 
It isn’t enough to dismiss Dionysius as evil or insane, since every one of us becomes a little Dionysius once we allow the appetites to run ahead of the intellect. The outer conflict is a consequence of the inner tension. 

—Reflection written in 2/1999