The Death of Marcus Aurelius

The Death of Marcus Aurelius

Saturday, September 9, 2023

Dhammapada 338-343


As a tree, even though it has been cut down, is firm so long as its root is safe, and grows again, thus, unless the feeders of thirst are destroyed, the pain of life will return again and again. 

He whose thirst running towards pleasure is exceedingly strong in the thirty-six channels, the waves will carry away that misguided man, that is, his desires which are set on passion. 

The channels run everywhere, the creeper of passion stands sprouting; if you see the creeper springing up, cut its root by means of knowledge. 

A creature's pleasures are extravagant and luxurious; sunk in lust and looking for pleasure, men undergo, again and again, birth and decay. 

Men, driven on by thirst, run about like a snared hare; held in fetters and bonds, they undergo pain for a long time, again and again. 

Men, driven on by thirst, run about like a snared hare; let therefore the mendicant drive out thirst, by striving after passionlessness for himself. 

IMAGE: Willow Schafer, Golden Snare (2018) 




Friday, September 8, 2023

Michael Leunig 52




Sayings of Publilius Syrus 124


There is rarely a loss when plenty is unknown. 

Cicero, Tusculan Disputations 3.17


M. Should Pythagoras, Socrates, or Plato say to me, “Why are you dejected or sad? Why do you faint, and yield to fortune, which, perhaps, may have power to harass and disturb you, but should not quite unman you? There is great power in the virtues; rouse them, if they chance to droop. 
 
“Take fortitude for your guide, which will give you such spirits that you will despise everything that can befall man, and look on it as a trifle. 
 
“Add to this temperance, which is moderation, and which was just now called frugality, which will not suffer you to do anything base or bad—for what is worse or baser than an effeminate man? 
 
“Not even justice will suffer you to act in this manner, though she seems to have the least weight in this affair; but still, notwithstanding, even she will inform you that you are doubly unjust when you both require what does not belong to you, inasmuch as though you who have been born mortal demand to be placed in the condition of the immortals, and at the same time you take it much to heart that you are to restore what was lent you. 
 
“What answer will you make to prudence, who informs you that she is a virtue sufficient of herself both to teach you a good life and also to secure you a happy one? And, indeed, if she were fettered by external circumstances, and dependent on others, and if she did not originate in herself and return to herself, and also embrace everything in herself, so as to seek no adventitious aid from any quarter, I cannot imagine why she should appear deserving of such lofty panegyrics, or of being sought after with such excessive eagerness.” 
 
Now, Epicurus, if you call me back to such goods as these, I will obey you, and follow you, and use you as my guide, and even forget, as you order me, all my misfortunes; and I will do this the more readily from a persuasion that they are not to be ranked among evils at all. 
 
But you are for bringing my thoughts over to pleasure. What pleasures? Pleasures of the body, I imagine, or such as are recollected or imagined on account of the body. Is this all? Do I explain your opinion rightly? For your disciples are used to deny that we understand at all what Epicurus means. 
 
This is what he says, and what that subtle fellow, old Zeno, who is one of the sharpest of them, used, when I was attending lectures at Athens, to enforce and talk so loudly of; saying that he alone was happy who could enjoy present pleasure, and who was at the same time persuaded that he should enjoy it without pain, either during the whole or the greatest part of his life; or if, should any pain interfere, if it was very sharp, then it must be short; should it be of longer continuance, it would have more of what was sweet than bitter in it; that whosoever reflected on these things would be happy, especially if satisfied with the good things which he had already enjoyed, and if he were without fear of death or of the Gods. 

—from Cicero, Tusculan Disputations 3.17 
 
While the hedonism of Epicurus is far from the boundless consumption and gratification we are so familiar with in our everyday lives, it remains a form of hedonism nonetheless, for it still makes the presence of pleasure, however moderated, and the absence of pain, however endured, the necessary conditions for a good life. 
 
Observe how many people will automatically assume that happiness is no more than a subjective feeling, and you will then recognize how deeply imbedded such a dependence on the appetites is in our attitudes. You will be met with a blank stare if you suggest that the value of the passions is relative to the value of the thoughts and the actions that stand behind them. 
 
Neither Cicero nor the admittedly more rigorous Stoic wish to deny the place of the emotions, but they rather argue why they must be understood within the greater context of character. The good man may well feel good about his deeds, but it is the way that he judges and chooses to live that are the root of his self-worth.
 
And so the study and practice of philosophy, undertaken in my own peculiar way, have encouraged me to always ask myself whether I am merely gaining pleasure or seeking after the virtues. Which of these will be my highest goal? 
 
Over the years, the story about Hercules at the Crossroads, where he had to decide between pursuing gratification or conscience as the best path for his life, has become something of an ideal standard for my own choices, however mundane. I believe all of us must make that determination, sooner or later, and when I feel the lure of Pleasure, I then imagine what Virtue might say to offer me a better option. If only I bother to listen, her advice does not steer me wrong. 
 
Pythagoras, Socrates, or Plato always mirror her wisdom, and while different schools of philosophy will stress different methods and principles, those who embrace human nature as essentially rational will also revere moral excellence as the greatest quality any person can possess. 
 
If I have the integrity of my convictions, how can fortune ever stand against me? As long as I am loyal to the cardinal virtues, I can know with certainty that I am doing what I was made to do, for these virtues are the perfection of my very identity. They are the pillars that support happy living. 
 
Fortitude makes worldly obstacles seem insignificant in the face of a noble spirit. 
 
Temperance allows me to rise above temptations by showing me how little I really need. 
 
Justice reminds me to be content with what is my own, and to share freely with my neighbors, so that there is no cause for making an enemy of any man. 
 
Prudence guides me with the fundamental and profound awareness that the happy man is first and foremost the good man. 
 
I can make as much of a fuss as I like about increasing pleasure or diminishing pain, but all of that avoids the more pressing matter of clinging to righteousness and fleeing from wickedness. 

—Reflection written in 10/1996 

IMAGE: Adamo Scultori, Hercules at the Crossroads (c. 1550) 



Wednesday, September 6, 2023

Xenophon, Memorabilia of Socrates 26


At another time, he had noticed the angry temper shown by Lamprocles, the elder of his sons, towards their mother, and thus addressed himself to the lad. 

Socrates: "Pray, my son, did you ever hear of certain people being called ungrateful?" 

"That I have," replied the young man. 

Socrates: "And have you understood what it is they do to get that bad name?" 

Lamprocles: "Yes, I have: when any one has been kindly treated, and has it in his power to requite the kindness but neglects to do so, men call him ungrateful." 

Socrates: "And you admit that people reckon the ungrateful among wrongdoers?" 

Lamprocles: "I do." 

Socrates: "And has it ever struck you to inquire whether, as regards the right or wrong of it, ingratitude may not perhaps resemble some such conduct as the enslavement, say, of prisoners, which is accounted wrong towards friends but justifiable towards enemies?" 

Lamprocles: "Yes, I have put that question to myself. In my opinion, no matter who confers the kindness, friend or foe, the recipient should endeavor to requite it, failing which he is a wrongdoer." 

Socrates: "Then if that is how the matter stands, ingratitude would be an instance of pure unadulterate wrongdoing?" 

Lamprocles assented to the proposition. 

Socrates: "It follows, then, that in proportion to the greatness of the benefit conferred, the greater his misdoing who fails to requite the kindness?" 

Lamprocles again assented. 

Socrates continued: "And where can we hope to find greater benefits than those which children derive from their parents—their father and mother who brought them out of nothingness into being, who granted them to look upon all these fair sights, and to partake of all those blessings which the gods bestow on man, things so priceless in our eyes that one and all we shudder at the thought of leaving them, and states have made death the penalty for the greatest crimes, because there is no greater evil through fear of which to stay iniquity. 

"You do not suppose that human beings produce children for the sake of carnal pleasure merely; were this the motive, street and bordello are full of means to quit them of that thrall; whereas nothing is plainer than the pains we take to seek out wives who shall bear us the finest children. With these we wed, and carry on the race. 

"The man has a twofold duty to perform: partly in cherishing her who is to raise up children along with him, and partly towards the children yet unborn in providing them with things that he thinks will contribute to their well-being—and of these as large a store as possible. 

"The woman, conceiving, bears her precious burthen with travail and pain, and at the risk of life itself—sharing with that within her womb the food on which she herself is fed. And when with much labor she has borne to the end and brought forth her offspring, she feeds it and watches over it with tender care—not in return for any good thing previously received, for indeed the babe itself is little conscious of its benefactor and cannot even signify its wants; only she, the mother, making conjecture of what is good for it, and what will please it, essays to satisfy it; and for many months she feeds it night and day, enduring the toil nor recking what return she shall receive for all her trouble. 

"Nor does the care and kindness of parents end with nurture; but when the children seem of an age to learn, they teach them themselves whatever cunning they possess, as a guide to life, or where they feel that another is more competent, to him they send them to be taught at their expense. Thus they watch over their children, doing all in their power to enable them to grow up to be as good as possible." 

"So be it." the youth answered; "but even if she have done all that, and twenty times as much, no soul on earth could endure my mother's cross-grained temper." 

Then Socrates: "Which, think you, would be harder to bear—a wild beast's savagery or a mother's?" 

 
Lamprocles: "To my mind, a mother's—at least if she be such as mine." 

Socrates: "Dear me! And has this mother ever done you any injury—such as people frequently receive from beasts, by bite or kick?" 

Lamprocles: "If she has not done quite that, she uses words which any one would sooner sell his life than listen to." 

Socrates: "And how many annoyances have you caused your mother, do you suppose, by fretfulness and peevishness in word and deed, night and day, since you were a little boy? How much sorrow and pain, when you were ill?" 

Lamprocles: "Well, I never said or did anything to bring a blush to her cheeks." 

Socrates: "No, come now! Do you suppose it is harder for you to listen to your mother's speeches than for actor to listen to actor on the tragic stage, when the floodgates of abuse are opened?" 

Lamprocles: "Yes; for the simple reason that they know it is all talk on their parts. The inquisitor may cross-question, but he will not inflict a fine; the threatener may hurl his menaces, but he will do no mischief—that is why they take it all so easily." 

Socrates: "Then ought you to fly into a passion, who know well enough that, whatever your mother says, she is so far from meaning you mischief that she is actually wishing blessings to descend upon you beyond all others? Or do you believe that your mother is really ill disposed towards you?" 

Lamprocles: "No, I do not think that." 

Socrates: "Then this mother, who is kindly disposed to you, and takes such tender care of you when you are ill to make you well again, and to see that you want for nothing which may help you; and, more than all, who is perpetually pleading for blessings in your behalf and offering her vows to Heaven—can you say of her that she is cross-grained and harsh? For my part, I think, if you cannot away with such a mother, you cannot away with such blessings either. 

"But tell me," he proceeded, "do you owe service to any living being, think you? Or are you prepared to stand alone? Prepared not to please or try to please a single soul? To follow none? To obey neither general nor ruler of any sort? Is that your attitude, or do you admit that you owe allegiance to somebody?" 

Lamprocles: "Yes; certainly I owe allegiance." 

Socrates: "May I take it that you are willing to please at any rate your neighbor, so that he may kindle a fire for you in your need, may prove himself a ready helpmate in good fortune, or if you chance on evil and are stumbling, may friendlily stand by your side to aid?" 

Lamprocles: "I am willing." 

Socrates: "Well, and what of that other chance companion—your fellow-traveller by land or sea? What of any others, you may light upon? Is it indifferent to you whether these be friends or not, or do you admit that the goodwill of these is worth securing by some pains on your part?" 

Lamprocles: "I do." 

Socrates: "It stands thus then: you are prepared to pay attention to this, that, and the other stranger, but to your mother who loves you more than all else, you are bound to render no service, no allegiance? 

"Do you not know that whilst the state does not concern itself with ordinary ingratitude or pass judicial sentence on it; whilst it overlooks the thanklessness of those who fail to make return for kindly treatment, it reserves its pains and penalties for the special case? 

"If a man render not the service and allegiance due to his parents, on him the finger of the law is laid; his name is struck off the roll; he is forbidden to hold the archonship—which is as much as to say, 'Sacrifices in behalf of the state offered by such a man would be no offerings, being tainted with impiety; nor could anything else be well and justly performed of which he is the doer.' 

"Heaven help us! If a man fail to adorn the sepulcher of his dead parents the state takes cognizance of the matter, and inquisition is made in the scrutiny of the magistrates. 

"And as for you, my son, if you are in your sober senses, you will earnestly entreat your mother, lest the very gods take you to be an ungrateful being, and on their side also refuse to do you good; and you will beware of men also, lest they should perceive your neglect of your parents, and with one consent hold you in dishonor; and so you find yourself in a desert devoid of friends. 

"For if once the notion be entertained that here is a man ungrateful to his parents, no one will believe that any kindness shown you would be other than thrown away." 

—from Xenophon, Memorabilia 2.2 

IMAGE: Mary Cassatt, The Child's Bath (1893) 



Maxims of Goethe 22


Superstition is a part of the very being of humanity; and when we fancy that we are banishing it altogether, it takes refuge in the strangest nooks and corners, and then suddenly comes forth again, as soon as it believes itself at all safe. 

IMAGE: Joseph E. Baker, The Witch (1892) 



Cicero, Tusculan Disputations 3.16


M. In the first place, they are wrong in forbidding men to premeditate on futurity and blaming their wish to do so; for there is nothing that breaks the edge of grief and lightens it more than considering, during one’s whole life, that there is nothing which it is impossible should happen, or than, considering what human nature is, on what conditions life was given, and how we may comply with them. 
 
The effect of which is that we are always grieving, but that we never do so; for whoever reflects on the nature of things, the various turns of life, and the weakness of human nature, grieves, indeed, at that reflection; but while so grieving he is, above all other times, behaving as a wise man, for he gains these two things by it: 
 
One, that while he is considering the state of human nature he is performing the special duties of philosophy, and that he is provided with a triple medicine against adversity—in the first place, because he has long reflected that such things might befall him, and this reflection by itself contributes much towards lessening and weakening all misfortunes; and, secondly, because he is persuaded that we should bear all the accidents which can happen to man with the feelings and spirit of a man; and, lastly, because he considers that what is blamable is the only evil. 
 
But it is not your fault that something has happened to you which it was impossible for man to avoid. For that withdrawing of our thoughts which he recommends when he calls us off from contemplating our misfortunes is an imaginary action; for it is not in our power to dissemble or to forget those evils which lie heavy on us; they tear, vex, and sting us—they burn us up, and leave no breathing time. 
 
And do you order us to forget them (for such forgetfulness is contrary to nature), and at the same time deprive us of the only assistance which nature affords, the being accustomed to them? For that, though it is but a slow medicine (I mean that which is brought by lapse of time), is still a very effectual one.
 
You order me to employ my thoughts on something good, and forget my misfortunes. You would say something worthy of a great philosopher if you thought those things good which are best suited to the dignity of human nature. 

—from Cicero, Tusculan Disputations 3.16 
 
I do not wish to question the intentions of Epicurus, for I deeply admire his commitment to a peaceful life, but I do, along with Cicero, wonder if he is selling himself short. I feel deeply uncomfortable when people now speak so confidently about “letting it go” or “moving on”, as if the best thing to do is to ignore a difficulty, or even to dismiss a responsibility. 
 
Once I notice people casually waving their hands in a refusal to engage their situations, I see red. I suspect these are the folks who are worried more about convenience than they are about conscience. 
 
Yes, while it is indeed necessary to improve and to grow, that is hardly the same thing as pretending as if it never happened. I have now been on the receiving end of it far too often to find any merit in running away, and that is precisely why I make a deliberate point of never turning my back on anyone or anything that has been an occasion for grief, however severe. 
 
Nothing is ever resolved by suppression or by neglect. For any immediate relief gained by looking away, there is an ultimate loss of integrity and of character. Forcing it aside always makes me a worse man, and so it dooms me to being a miserable man. The fault is them my own, not that of another. 
 
It is never wrong for me to understand who I am, why I am here, and how to manage the reality of my circumstances; what the critics call “overthinking” is actually about disorderly reflection, not about any sound reasoning. 
 
Now that I am more willing to be accountable for myself, there is no better remedy for misfortune than “working it out”. This or that may have happened, and this or that may still happen, yet my capacity to discover meaning and purpose in such events is a true liberation. 
 
With my apologies to the film Lawrence of Arabia, of course it still hurts! The trick is in not minding that it hurts, in that a reference to my sense of right and wrong can make all things both bearable and beneficial. I am assaulted by grief daily, though I now refuse to let it consume me—I strive to make use of it. I both try to do my duty, as I can best judge it, and I then further find my serenity in my best fulfillment of that duty. 
 
I must admit I originally read over this chapter too quickly, and only upon returning to it have I gained a greater resolve: 
 
1) If I expect whatever might come to me, I have trained myself in constancy. 
 
2) If I train myself in constancy, I learn to depend upon what is within me, not upon what lies without. 
 
3) If I depend upon what is within me, I can never blame another man for my grief. 
 
Virtue is formed by the formation of habit, and the formation of habit demands staring a sadness over any loss straight in the face—not coldly, but with a limitless supply of love. 
 
I do not care that Cicero was not an “orthodox” Stoic; he ends up teaching me to be very much like one in practice with these inspiring words. 

—Reflection written in 10/1996 



Tuesday, September 5, 2023

Stoic Snippets 210


You have endured infinite troubles through not being contented with your ruling faculty, when it does the things which it is constituted by nature to do. 

But enough of this! 

—Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 9.26 

IMAGE: Alessandro Magnasco, Satire on a Nobleman in Misery (1719) 



Cages




Monday, September 4, 2023

Delphic Maxims 33


Ἴδια φύλαττε 
Guard what is yours 



Man's Search for Meaning 2


As this story is about my experiences as an ordinary prisoner, it is important that I mention, not without pride, that I was not employed as a psychiatrist in camp, or even as a doctor, except for the last few weeks. A few of my colleagues were lucky enough to be employed in poorly heated first-aid posts applying bandages made of scraps of waste paper. But I was Number 119,104, and most of the time I was digging and laying tracks for railway lines. At one time, my job was to dig a tunnel, without help, for a water main under a road. 

This feat did not go unrewarded; just before Christmas 1944, I was presented with a gift of so-called "premium coupons." These were issued by the construction firm to which we were practically sold as slaves: the firm paid the camp authorities a fixed price per day, per prisoner. The coupons cost the firm fifty pfennigs each and could be exchanged for six cigarettes, often weeks later, although they sometimes lost their validity. I became the proud owner of a token worth twelve cigarettes. But more important, the cigarettes could be exchanged for twelve soups, and twelve soups were often a very real respite from starvation.  

The privilege of actually smoking cigarettes was reserved for the Capo, who had his assured quota of weekly coupons; or possibly for a prisoner who worked as a foreman in a warehouse or workshop and received a few cigarettes in exchange for doing dangerous jobs. The only exceptions to this were those who had lost the will to live and wanted to "enjoy" their last days. Thus, when we saw a comrade smoking his own cigarettes, we knew he had given up faith in his strength to carry on, and, once lost, the will to live seldom returned. 

—from Viktor Frankl, Man's Search for Meaning 

Cicero, Tusculan Disputations 3.15


Therefore, as Terence has so well expressed what he borrowed from philosophy, shall not we, from whose fountains he drew it, say the same thing in a better manner, and abide by it with more steadiness? 
 
Hence came that steady countenance, which, according to Xantippe, her husband Socrates always had; so that she said that she never observed any difference in his looks when he went out and when he came home. Yet the look of that old Roman, M. Crassus, who, as Lucilius says, never smiled but once in his lifetime, was not of this kind, but placid and serene, for so we are told. He, indeed, might well have had the same look at all times who never changed his mind, from which the countenance derives its expression. 
 
So that I am ready to borrow of the Cyrenaics those arms against the accidents and events of life by means of which, by long premeditation, they break the force of all approaching evils; and at the same time I think that those very evils themselves arise more from opinion than nature, for if they were real, no forecast could make them lighter. 
 
But I shall speak more particularly on these matters after I have first considered Epicurus’s opinion, who thinks that all people must necessarily be uneasy who believe themselves to be in any evils, let them be either foreseen and expected, or habitual to them; for with him evils are not the less by reason of their continuance, nor the lighter for having been foreseen; and it is folly to ruminate on evils to come, or such as, perhaps, never may come: every evil is disagreeable enough when it does come; but he who is constantly considering that some evil may befall him is loading himself with a perpetual evil; and even should such evil never light on him, he voluntarily takes upon himself unnecessary misery, so that he is under constant uneasiness, whether he actually suffers any evil, or only thinks of it. 
 
But he makes the alleviation of grief depend on two things—a ceasing to think on evil, and a turning to the contemplation of pleasure. For he thinks that the mind may possibly be under the power of reason, and follow her directions: he forbids us, therefore, to mind trouble, and calls us off from sorrowful reflections; he throws a mist over our eyes to hinder us from the contemplation of misery. 
 
Having sounded a retreat from this statement, he drives our thoughts on again, and encourages them to view and engage the whole mind in the various pleasures with which he thinks the life of a wise man abounds, either from reflecting on the past, or from the hope of what is to come. 
 
I have said these things in my own way; the Epicureans have theirs. However, let us examine what they say; how they say it is of little consequence. 

—from Cicero, Tusculan Disputations 3.15 
 
Though I am hardly qualified to expound on the subtle differences between the Cyrenaics and the Epicureans, I find it interesting how the former had far more trust than the latter in the power of the mind to manage the appearances of evil. 
 
While hard experience has taught me that I can indeed prepare myself for the approach of what is bad, I am also familiar with the feeling that merely thinking about something harmful will bring me to misery. On my stronger days I face the hardship head-on, and on my weaker days I find myself seeking some sort of diversion to get the negativity out of my head. 
 
Since both the Cyrenaics and the Epicureans placed human happiness in the presence of pleasure and the absence of pain, the problem of negative emotions was a greater obstacle for them than it was for the Stoics, Academics, or Peripatetics, for whom feelings were always to be in the service of the virtues. 
 
If I believe that the passions are the be-all and end-all of my existence, I am going to have a much harder time coping with grief. I will have no higher standard, so to speak, to which I can appeal. 
 
The Cyrenaics, at least, proposed taking the bull by the horns, and digging in our heels when we sense impending pain. In contrast, the Epicureans could only suggest sidestepping the matter by avoiding unpleasant impressions or by attempting to think “happy thoughts” instead of “unhappy thoughts”. 
 
Yet hurtful sensations will inevitably come, and refusing to reflect upon harsh realities will not make them magically disappear. While I have a great respect for the Epicurean quest toward emotional balance, I’m afraid I have never had any long-term success at finding inner peace by hiding myself away. I am clueless without the capacity to understand the meaning of loss, and I must place it within the context of a greater purpose. 
 
When I read about the constancy of character displayed by the great philosophers from history, or when I see those around me, however modest and unassuming, finding the strength of their convictions, I am reminded of how I have far more power over my thoughts and feelings that I might initially believe. Let me observe what moves them to such a joy in fortitude, so that I too can learn to stay the course. 
 
These days, I tend to worry over my future with a reference back to the grief from my past. Must it continue? Will it eventually fade, or will it constantly linger? On any given day, my thoughts will regularly drift to the memory of someone I loved and lost, and so I must decide what to make of these rather unwelcome visitors. 
 
Wishing them away, or getting caught up in a distraction, is too much like sweeping the dust under the carpet. No, I must practice the fine art of grappling with my demons, and of finding a way to transform the perceived evil into a genuine good. 
 
Ignoring an inconvenient truth does not force it to disappear; quite the contrary, it is all the more likely to fester. 

—Reflection written in 10/1996 



Saturday, September 2, 2023

Howard Jones, Dream into Action 5


The UK and US versions of the album diverge quite significantly from this point on, and though I now follow the UK sequencing, I remain so attached to my old US vinyl copy that I will still automatically hear the next song in my head as soon as the previous one is coming to a close. That is how powerful old habits can be! 

"Look Mama" was also released as a single in the UK, reaching #10, but it was somehow not deemed suitable for radio promotion by the suits in the US. I can only speculate that this is because it is about something as mundane as a mother and her son, not about brooding romance, angry protest, or cosmic musings. Given the basic innocence and sincerity of his music, it's a wonder Jones ever found any label support in America at all. . . 

Here is yet another example of a song that changes with the years, by which I really mean that it is the same old song, though I have slowly but surely changed my own thinking about its meaning. 

I dare you to find me a teenager who doesn't feel like his parents are stifling him. This is only natural, and the young soul is quite right to seek greater self-discovery and self-expression. Jones apparently didn't write this about his own mother, and was instead moved by the many letters he received from his young fans. 

As the years have passed, I still see the importance of letting people find their own way, yet I am also acutely aware of how foolish and reckless youth can be, so the demands sound a little bittersweet to me. I suppose, however, that if children never made their many horrific blunders, they would never manage to become adults. 

The errors are in themselves a necessary part of the growth, and they must serve as painful opportunities for a richer awareness. Mum and Dad must trust that they have given their best, and let the little bird fly on his own. 

It's ultimately a variation of Stoic Wisdom #37: a man can only make, or break, himself. 

—5/2007 

A few words of commentary from Howard Jones: 


And the song itself: 


Howard Jones, "Look Mama" from Dream into Action (1985) 

Honey, I think Audrey's a little mature for you
No I don't think she's mature I think she's nice 
Hey mom when are we going? 

Look mama I Love you 
But you gotta let me live my life 
Look mama I Love you 
But you gotta let me live my life 

Don't wrap me up in cotton wool 
You can't treat me like a fool 
Anyway if I was, you gotta let me be one 
OK give me your advice 
It's not my fault if I can't be wise 
Show me a person who hasn't been done 

Look mama I Love you 
But you gotta let me live my life 
Look mama I Love you 
But you gotta let me live my life 

Don't try to stick your rules on me 
I wasn't born as a carbon copy 
I came out of you 
But don't think that you own me 
I have my respect for you 
I won't try to change the things you do 
Give me a break 
Let me learn it my way 

You think you know more than me 
Experience hasn't set you free 

Look mama I Love you 
Look mama, look, look mama, look 
Look mama I Love you 
Loom mama, look, look mama, look 

I gotta make my own mistakes 
Why can't you treat me like a friend? 

Look mama I Love you 
But you gotta let me live my life 
Look mama I Love you 
But you gotta let me live my life 

Look mama I Love you 
Look mama, look, look mama, look 
Look mama, look 



Friday, September 1, 2023

Stobaeus on Stoic Ethics 1


This new series of posts is from a presentation of Stoic ethics preserved in the Anthology of Stobaeus (5th century AD). It was most likely written by Arius Didymus (1st century BC). 

The views of Zeno and the rest of the Stoics about the ethical part of philosophy: 

Zeno says that whatever participates in substance exists and that of things which exist some are good, some bad, and some indifferent. 

Good are things like this: prudence, temperance, justice, courage, and everything which either is virtue or participates in virtue. 

Bad are things like this: imprudence, wantonness, injustice, cowardice, and everything which either is vice or participates in vice. 

Indifferent are things like this: life and death, good and bad reputation, pleasure and pain, wealth and poverty, health and disease, and things similar to these. 



Sayings of Ramakrishna 221


Q: Is it proper to keep the Brâhmanical thread? 

A: When the knowledge of self is obtained, all fetters fall off of themselves. 

Then there is no distinction of a Brâhmana or a Sûdra, a high caste or a low caste. In that case the sacred thread-sign of caste falls away of itself. 

But so long as a man has the consciousness of distinction and difference he should not forcibly throw it off. 



Cicero, Tusculan Disputations 3.14


M. Therefore, this ruminating beforehand upon future evils which you see at a distance makes their approach more tolerable; and on this account what Euripides makes Theseus say is much commended. You will give me leave to translate them, as is usual with me: 
 
“I treasured up what some learn’d sage did tell,
And on my future misery did dwell;
I thought of bitter death, of being drove
Far from my home by exile, and I strove
With every evil to possess my mind,
That, when they came, I the less care might find.” 
 
But Euripides says that of himself, which Theseus said he had heard from some learned man, for the poet had been a pupil of Anaxagoras, who, as they relate, on hearing of the death of his son, said, “I knew that my son was mortal;” which speech seems to intimate that such things afflict those men who have not thought on them before. 
 
Therefore, there is no doubt but that all those things which are considered evils are the heavier from not being foreseen. Though, notwithstanding this is not the only circumstance which occasions the greatest grief, still, as the mind, by foreseeing and preparing for it, has great power to make all grief the less, a man should at all times consider all the events that may befall him in this life; and certainly the excellence and divine nature of wisdom consists in taking a near view of, and gaining a thorough acquaintance with, all human affairs, in not being surprised when anything happens, and in thinking, before the event, that there is nothing but what may come to pass. 
 
“Wherefore ev’ry man,
When his affairs go on most swimmingly,
E’en then it most behooves to arm himself
Against the coming storm: loss, danger, exile,
Returning ever, let him look to meet;
His son in fault, wife dead, or daughter sick;
All common accidents, and may have happen’d
That nothing shall seem new or strange. But if
Aught has fall’n out beyond his hopes, all that
Let him account clear gain." 

—from Cicero, Tusculan Disputations 3.14 
 
I was far from being an exemplary Boy Scout, though as the years have passed, I have come to realize how great an influence my old Scoutmaster had on the formation of my character. He was a true gentleman, and like any good gentleman, he combined a remarkable strength with a patient kindness. If I could right now be a little bit more like he was back then, I would die happy. 
 
As is common with gruff teenagers, we would recite the Scout Oath and the Scout Law without really thinking about what they meant, and we assumed the Scout Motto, “Be Prepared”, was mainly about getting our camping gear in order. 
 
Yet on a bitterly cold camping trip, in the harshest weather the region had seen in ages, my Scoutmaster gave a brief but profoundly moving explanation of how preparation also meant being ready to endure any hardship, not just of the body but also of the spirit. 
 
“If your head is on straight, and your heart is in the right place, what does the cold matter? Expect everything, and then nothing will surprise you.” 
 
Where is the “winning”? Simply in rising to the task. Both pain and death are inevitable. Now how will I make myself ready to face them with dignity? While I laughed at the phrase then, I now appreciate the old-school advice to gird my loins. 
 
Euripides has Theseus express these principles nobly, and the statement from Anaxagoras, which I have also seen attributed to Xenophon, gives it to me far more bluntly. The final passage from Terence properly reminds us not to become complacent when fortune smiles upon us, and to always be fortified for that moment when she changes her mood. You tell me it will never happen? I assure you it will. 
 
Some might say that Anaxagoras was being heartless, yet we should not confuse his candor with an insensitivity. That he understood why his son must die, sooner or later, does not mean he did not feel a great loss—it simply means he had already braced himself for the harsh blow. 
 
To be calm is not the same as being uncaring. As Cicero says, this can be achieved when I make the effort to learn about all the highs and the lows of this life, to closely familiarize myself with the ways of the world. Once I am accustomed to the breadth of what may happen, I acquire the necessary depth of awareness to remain steadfast and serene. 
 
Parents rightly wish to protect their children from danger; this does not, however, mean we should hide them away from the realities of life. Learning to cope requires becoming familiar with the lay of the land, and immediate experience, however disturbing, is often the best training for what is sure to come. 
 
To plan for the worst is not pessimism if it is guided by a regard for the best within us. 

—Reflection written in 10/1996 

IMAGE: Jusepe de Ribera, Anaxagoras (1636)